Policy Innovation in Volatile Organic Compound Control: International Experience and Implementation Readiness of China’s VOC Environmental Protection Tax Pilot
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/xp583r42Keywords:
Volatile Organic Compounds, Environmental Protection Tax, Economic Instruments, Policy Innovation, International Comparison.Abstract
As an emerging market-based instrument for air pollution control, China will begin levying an environmental protection tax on volatile organic compounds (VOCs) on a pilot basis on 1 January 2027 under the Pilot Measures for Levying Environmental Protection Tax on Volatile Organic Compounds. The institutional framework has been settled, but supporting rules such as source-category calculation methods and provincial applicable tax amounts are still pending. To support implementation, this study reviewed the operating rules of VOC-related taxes, charges and economic incentives in the South Coast Air Quality Management District of the United States, Switzerland, Japan and the Taiwan region of China, and compared them item by item with China’s pilot scheme along four dimensions: the location of the price signal and tax base, scope and thresholds, quantification and verification, and rates and incentives. The reviewed cases represent three approaches—emission-stage charging, supply-side taxation and investment-side incentives—and their performance depends mainly on the rules for identifying the tax base, quantifying emissions, verifying filings and designing incentives. China’s pilot shares comparable mechanisms with these systems in emission-stage taxation, source-specific quantification and deemed assessment for misreporting. At the same time, it introduces institutional innovations that connect the new tax with existing environmental tax, pollutant discharge permitting and performance grading systems: the deduction of 18 separately taxed VOC species after source-category aggregation, the separate taxation of VOCs as a whole, and tax relief linked to environmental performance grades. Implementation preparations should give priority to issuing source-category calculation methods and verification feedback rules, and use pilot data to evaluate simplified administration for small emitters, provincial tax amounts, permit-based taxpayer identification and the tax application of performance grades.
Downloads
References
[1] Zhang, H., Jiang, H., Gao, J., et al. (2022). Formation mechanism of PM2.5 and ozone pollution and ideas for their coordinated prevention and control (in Chinese). Research of Environmental Sciences, 35(3), 611–620. https://doi.org/10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2022.01.03.
[2] Wang, H., Sun, S., Nie, L., et al. (2023). A review of whole-process control of industrial volatile organic compounds in China. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 123, 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2022.02.037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2022.02.037
[3] Liang, M., & Zuo, Y. (2026). Empirical study and prediction on the influencing factors of carbon emission rights trading prices: taking the national carbon emission rights trading market in China as an example. Journal of Innovation and Development, 15(2), 121–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54097/ppbeq220
[4] Goulder, L. H., & Parry, I. W. H. (2008). Instrument choice in environmental policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(2), 152–174. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/ren005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/ren005
[5] Ministry of Finance, National Development and Reform Commission, & Ministry of Environmental Protection. (2015). Pilot measures for levying pollutant discharge fees on volatile organic compounds (in Chinese). https://www.mof.gov.cn/gp/xxgkml/szs/201506/t20150626_2510508.htm
[6] Department of Tax Policy of the Ministry of Finance, Department of Property and Behavior Taxes of the State Taxation Administration, & Department of Atmospheric Environment of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment. (2026). Officials answer press questions on the pilot levying of environmental protection tax on volatile organic compounds (in Chinese). https://www.mee.gov.cn/zcwj/zcjd/202607/t20260724_1162735.shtml
[7] Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress. (2025). Decision on amending the Environmental Protection Tax Law of the People’s Republic of China (in Chinese). https://fgk.chinatax.gov.cn/zcfgk/c100009/c5245547/content.html
[8] Ministry of Finance, State Taxation Administration, & Ministry of Ecology and Environment. (2026). Notice on issuing the Pilot Measures for Levying Environmental Protection Tax on Volatile Organic Compounds, Cai Shui [2026] No. 50 (in Chinese). https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk10/202607/t20260724_1162734.html
[9] Chen, S. Q., & Dai, L. (2024). Reflections on including volatile organic compounds in the scope of environmental protection tax (in Chinese). Taxation Research, (8), 114–119.
[10] Pan, R. X., Wang, J. D., & Wu, J. (2023). Environmental and economic impacts of levying an environmental protection tax on VOCs: a case study of Hebei Province (in Chinese). Research of Environmental Sciences, 36(11), 2090–2098. https://doi.org/10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2023.09.10
[11] Qian, Z. W., Long, F., Duan, X. M., et al. (2024). Environmental and economic impact analysis of levying VOCs environmental protection tax in China. Heliyon, 10(17), e36738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36738 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36738
[12] Chen, M. X., Yang, X., Zhang, Q., et al. (2024). Accounting methods for VOC emission rights in key industries: a case study of enterprises in Hubei Province (in Chinese). Environmental Science & Technology (China), 47(S2), 245–250.
[13] Yang, Y. T. (2026). Implementation path for levying environmental protection tax on volatile organic compounds in China: lessons from the Swiss VOC incentive tax (in Chinese). Journal of the Taxation Cadre College of the State Taxation Administration, 39(2), 16–26.
[14] United States Congress. (1990). Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7401 et seq. U.S. Government Publishing Office.
[15] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2026). Who has to obtain a Title V permit? https://www.epa.gov/title-v-operating-permits/who-has-obtain-title-v-permit
[16] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2026). Permit fees. https://www.epa.gov/title-v-operating-permits/permit-fees
[17] South Coast Air Quality Management District. (2026). Rule 301: Permitting and associated fees. https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/reg-iii/rule-301.pdf
[18] South Coast Air Quality Management District. (n.d.). Annual emissions reporting. https://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/compliance/annual-emission-reporting
[19] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2026). Guidance on developing fee programs required by Clean Air Act Section 185 for the ozone national ambient air quality standards. https://www.epa.gov/ground-level-ozone-pollution/guidance-developing-fee-programs-required-clean-air-act-section-185
[20] South Coast Air Quality Management District. (n.d.). Rule 317.1—Clean Air Act nonattainment fees for 8-hour ozone standards. https://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/compliance/rule-317-1
[21] Swiss Federal Council. (n.d.). Ordinance on the incentive tax on volatile organic compounds (OVOC), SR 814.018. https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/1997/2972_2972_2972/en
[22] Federal Office for Customs and Border Security. (n.d.). Incentive tax on volatile organic compounds (VOC). https://www.bazg.admin.ch/en/incentive-fee-volatile-organic-compounds-voc
[23] Federal Office for the Environment. (n.d.). VOC incentive tax. https://www.bafu.admin.ch/de/voc
[24] Ministry of the Environment of Japan. (2005). On the Cabinet Order partially amending the Enforcement Order of the Air Pollution Control Act, the Ministerial Ordinance partially amending its Enforcement Regulations, and the measurement method for VOC concentrations (in Japanese). https://www.env.go.jp/press/6054.html
[25] Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan. (n.d.). Voluntary efforts to reduce emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC) (in Japanese). https://www.meti.go.jp/policy/voc/
[26] Ministry of the Environment of Japan. (2005). Preferential tax treatment and special financing for VOC emission control equipment (in Japanese). https://www.env.go.jp/houdou/gazou/6054/6831/2317.pdf
[27] Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan. (2009). Items reviewed (abolished or reduced) in the FY2010 tax reform (special taxation measures) (in Japanese). https://www.cao.go.jp/zei-cho/history/2009-2012/youbou/pdf/meti/22m_meti_k_04.pdf
[28] Japan Finance Corporation. (n.d.). Environment and energy countermeasure funds (air pollution) (in Japanese). https://www.jfc.go.jp/n/finance/search/15_kankyoutaisaku_t.html
[29] Ministry of the Environment of Japan. (2013). Report of the FY2012 study group on the volatile organic compound (VOC) emission inventory (in Japanese). https://www.env.go.jp/air/osen/voc/inventoryH24.html
[30] Environmental authority of the Taiwan region of China. (n.d.). Air Pollution Control Act (in Chinese). https://oaout.moenv.gov.tw/law/LawContent.aspx?id=FL015345
[31] Environmental authority of the Taiwan region of China. (n.d.). Regulations governing the collection of air pollution control fees (in Chinese). https://oaout.moenv.gov.tw/law/LawContent.aspx?id=FL015371
[32] Environmental authority of the Taiwan region of China. (n.d.). Promotion of air pollution control fee policies (in Chinese). https://air.moenv.gov.tw/envtopics/StationarySource_6.aspx
[33] Environmental authority of the Taiwan region of China. (2023). Air pollution control fee rates for stationary pollution sources (in Chinese). https://air.moenv.gov.tw/News/news.aspx?ID=1846
[34] Environmental authority of the Taiwan region of China. (n.d.). Regulations on fee reductions for air pollution control equipment of stationary pollution sources at public and private premises (in Chinese). https://oaout.moenv.gov.tw/Law/LawContent.aspx?id=FL045492
[35] European Parliament, & Council of the European Union. (2003). Directive 2003/87/EC establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, L 275, 32–46.
[36] European Commission. (2018). Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 on the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Union, L 334, 1–93.
[37] Zhang, Z. (2026). The impact of the carbon emissions trading system on the European Union decoupling index. Journal of Innovation and Development, 14(3), 204–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54097/vm2pex57
[38] General Office of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, General Office of the People’s Bank of China, & General Office of the State Taxation Administration. (2026). Guiding opinions on strengthening environmental performance grading management of key industries, Huan Ban Da Qi [2026] No. 2 (in Chinese). https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk05/202601/t20260119_1140965.html
[39] Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress. (2025). Environmental Protection Tax Law of the People’s Republic of China (in Chinese). https://fgk.chinatax.gov.cn/zcfgk/c100009/c5193032/content.html
[40] Pei, Y. (2026). The impact of energy conservation and emission reduction on urban green production efficiency: a quasi-natural experiment based on comprehensive demonstration cities for energy conservation and emission reduction policies. Journal of Innovation and Development, 14(3), 843–853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54097/5nk76n70
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
