Levels of AI Investment, Environmental Disclosure Performance, and Firms’ Interest-Bearing Debt Financing Levels
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/rw5ea757Keywords:
AI investment level, Environmental disclosure performance, Level of interest-bearing debt financing, Interest-bearing debt ratio, debt financingAbstract
Due to the broad use of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in enterprises’ operations, an issue arises regarding the influence of AI investments on the financing behavior of firms. In this study, a sample of Chinese A-share listed firms from 2010 to 2023 was used to empirically investigate the influence of AI investment levels on interest-bearing debt ratios of firms, as well as to test the role of environmental disclosure performance in this regard. The results show that there exists a strong positive relationship between AI investment levels and interest-bearing debt ratios, which might mean either a high propensity to finance through debt or higher interest-bearing debts of firms. According to the results of stepwise regression, it can be concluded that AI investments are negatively related to environmental disclosure performance, and environmental disclosure performance is negatively correlated with interest-bearing debt ratios of firms, suggesting resource trade-offs. Heterogeneity analysis shows that this effect is mainly valid for large-scale firms, and robustness tests confirm the main results of this paper.
Downloads
References
[1] Mei, H. Y., & Xu, M. Z. (2026). Can data element sharing boost investor confidence? Modern Finance and Economics (Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics), 46(7), 58–74.
[2] Liu, Y. (2026). The impact of new quality productive forces on independent innovation capability of advanced manufacturing enterprises. Enterprise Economy, 45(7), 16–26.
[3] Zhang, J. E., Wei, Y., & Wang, N. W. (2026). Research on the impact of digital transformation on the resilience of manufacturing industry chains. Enterprise Economy, 45(7), 38–47.
[4] Qiu, Y. Z., Chao, Y., & Zhang, S. F. (2026). Resource misallocation or cognitive bias: The impact of climate risk on corporate green total factor productivity. Journal of Guangxi Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 62(4), 122–137.
[5] Li, Y. R., Li, J. J., & Zhao, W. (2026). The impact of artificial intelligence application on corporate tax burden. Taxation and Economy, (4), 35–44.
[6] Wu, B., & Chen, F. (2026). ESG investment: Fashionable trend or radical driver? An explanatory framework based on shareholder activism. Zhejiang Academic Journal, (4), 209–219.
[7] Guan, M., & Yang, X. H. (2026). Green finance innovation and urban new quality productive forces: Evidence from green finance reform and innovation pilot zones. Modernization of Management, 46(3), 179–189.
[8] Fu, Y. H., & Wang, D. (2026). Scenario-driven digital transformation and upgrading of manufacturing: A case analysis based on typical industries. Journal of Industrial Technological Economics, 45(7), 70–80.
[9] Liu, Y., Li, T. X., & Huang, Z. H. (2026). Multi-dimensional driving mechanisms and improvement strategies for corporate environmental information disclosure performance: A machine learning analysis based on Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies. Journal of Industrial Technological Economics, 45(7), 145–158.
[10] Yuan, L., Li, X. L., He, W. J., & Cheng, J. (2026). Digital-intelligent transformation, green business philosophy, and corporate environmental information disclosure performance: Evidence from A-share manufacturing enterprises. Economic Problems, (7), 102–111.
[11] Xu, J., & Feng, D. (2026). From digitalization to digital-intelligence: Transformation and innovation of international Chinese language education technology. Journal of Henan University (Social Sciences Edition), 66(4), 122–128, 155–156.
[12] Zheng, Q. Y., Du, J. C., Liu, X. G., & Wang, F. S. (2026). Research on the impact of digital transformation on corporate real earnings management. Modernization of Management, 46(3), 152–165.
[13] Zhang, N., & Che, Z. L. (2026). Can sustainable development improve investment efficiency? A perspective based on corporate ESG practices. Modernization of Management, 46(3), 139–151.
[14] Hu, Y. L., Xu, A. Q., & Zhu, Y. C. (2026). The impact of digital transformation on corporate dynamic capabilities: Empirical evidence from Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies. Statistics & Decision, 42(12), 171–176.
[15] Li, M., You, J. M., & Li, W. C. (2026). Environmental information disclosure performance, supply chain resilience, and corporate green innovation performance. Statistics & Decision, 42(12), 177–183.
[16] Chang, J., & Kong, Z. H. (2026). Green finance, financing constraints, and corporate greenwashing risk. Statistics & Decision, 42(12), 142–147.
[17] Yang, C., Gao, Y. S., & Lyu, N. (2026). From chain restructuring to resilience enhancement: Changes in corporate customer-supplier relationships in the context of digitalization. Journal of International Trade, (6), 59–76.
[18] Meng, X. X., Wang, D., Jiang, K., & Yu, J. L. (2026). Green credit and global value chain embeddedness. Modern Finance Research, 31(6), 63–74.
[19] Liu, L. Z., & Wang, Y. Z. (2026). Environmental protection drivers, policy synergy, and corporate digital transformation. Journal of Central University of Finance and Economics, (6), 21–40.
[20] Qiu, J. L., Cui, M. M., & Pan, A. L. (2026). Supply chain finance and corporate sustainable development: Empirical evidence from environmental information disclosure performance. Nankai Business Review, 29(3), 28–39.
[21] Wang, D., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Corporate digital transformation, strategic green innovation, and corporate environmental performance. Economic Research Journal, 59(10), 113–131.
[22] Cao, Y., Li, X., Hu, H. L., Wan, G. Y., & Wang, S. Y. (2023). How does digitalization promote green transformation of manufacturing enterprises? An exploratory case study from the perspective of resource orchestration theory. Management World, 39(3), 96–112, 126, 113.
[23] Si, L. J., & Cao, H. Y. (2022). Can green credit policy improve corporate environmental social responsibility? Based on the perspectives of external constraints and internal attention. China Industrial Economics, (4), 137–155.
[24] Wang, B., & Yang, M. J. (2022). Research on the influencing mechanism of environmental information disclosure performance on corporate value: Empirical evidence from China’s A-share listed companies. Soft Science, 36(6), 78–84.
[25] Fülöp, M. T., & Cifuentes-Faura, J. (2026). The synergistic impact of corporate social responsibility and environmental, social, and governance disclosure on green innovation: Practical implications for sustainability-oriented innovation strategies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. Advance online publication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70852
[26] Tan, W., Yan, E. H., & Chen, X. H. (2025). Positive press, greener progress: The role of ESG media reputation in corporate energy innovation. Sustainable Development, 33(4), 5162–5184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3399
[27] Zheng, M., Wu, L., Feng, G. F., et al. (2025). The impact of green finance on sustainable development: An investigation into national ESG performance. Journal of Applied Economics, 28(1), Article 2528672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2025.2528672
[28] Zhang, X., Li, W., Ji, T., et al. (2024). The impact of ESG performance on firms’ technological innovation: Evidence from China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, Article 1342420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1342420
[29] Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., Tang, D. Y., et al. (2024). The effects of mandatory ESG disclosure around the world. Journal of Accounting Research, 62(5), 1795–1847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12548
[30] Hu, H., Jia, Z., & Yang, S. (2025). Exploring FinTech, green finance, and ESG performance across corporate life-cycles. International Review of Financial Analysis, 97, Article 103871. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103871
[31] Geng, Y., Chen, J., & Liu, R. (2024). ESG rating disagreement and corporate green innovation bubbles: Evidence from Chinese A-share listed firms. International Review of Financial Analysis, 95, Article 103495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103495
[32] Sun, G., Hu, X., Chen, X., et al. (2025). Sustainability uncertainty and supply chain financing: A perspective based on divergent ESG evaluations in China. Systems, 13(10), Article 850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13100850
[33] Seow, R. Y. C. (2024). Determinants of environmental, social, and governance disclosure: A systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(3), 2314–2330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3604
[34] Abdelbaky, A., Liu, T., Mingyang, X., et al. (2025). Real earnings management and ESG performance in China: The mediating role of corporate innovations. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 30(4), 3476–3499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.3074
[35] Camilleri, M. A. (2026). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors for sustainable tourism development: The way forward toward destination resilience and growth. Business Strategy and the Environment, 35(3), 4057–4082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70366
[36] Gao, D., Tan, L., & Duan, K. (2026). Forging a path to sustainability: The impact of Fintech on corporate ESG performance. The European Journal of Finance, 32(10–12), 1482–1500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2024.2416995
[37] Deng, B., Peng, Z., Albitar, K., et al. (2025). Top management team stability and ESG greenwashing: Evidence from China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(1), 450–467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3998
[38] Wang, S., & Zhang, H. (2025). Promoting sustainable development goals through generative artificial intelligence in the digital supply chain: Insights from Chinese tourism SMEs. Sustainable Development, 33(1), 1231–1248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3152
[39] Gao, D., Tan, L., & Chen, Y. (2025). Smarter is greener: Can intelligent manufacturing improve enterprises’ ESG performance? Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), Article 529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04853-5
[40] Wu, B., Ren, K., Fu, Y., et al. (2024). Institutional investor ESG activism and green supply chain management performance: Exploring contingent roles of technological interdependences in different digital intelligence contexts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 209, Article 123789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123789
[41] Li, H., Su, Y., Ding, C. J., et al. (2024). Unveiling the green innovation paradox: Exploring the impact of carbon emission reduction on corporate green technology innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 207, Article 123562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123562
[42] Ma, S., & Appolloni, A. (2025). Can financial flexibility enhance corporate green innovation performance? Evidence from an ESG approach in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 387, Article 125869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125869
[43] Wang, Q., Qi, Y., & Li, R. (2026). Artificial intelligence and corporate sustainability: Shaping the future of ESG in the age of Industry 5.0. Sustainable Development, 34(1), 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70200
[44] Duchin, R., Gao, J., & Xu, Q. (2025). Sustainability or greenwashing: Evidence from the asset market for industrial pollution. The Journal of Finance, 80(2), 699–754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13412
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
