The Structure and Substantive Innovation of Corporate Digital Transformation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/9f882c51Keywords:
Digital transformation; digital structure; substantive innovation; strategic innovation.Abstract
Under the circumstances of today’s digital economy, there have been many discrepancies regarding the success of digital transformation within companies. It is hard for firms to choose between slogans and real actions of digital transformation. The research in previous literature tends to use the digital index, which is more general, to assess the innovation effect, without considering the differences inside the structure within the four dimensions of strategic articulation, technological drive, organizational empowerment, and application implementation, which makes it impossible to explore the differential effects of digital transformation. Therefore, in this paper, I employ the sample of A-share listed companies from 2011 to 2023. Under the framework of the logic of digital implementation, the study decomposes digital transformation into four dimensions, namely strategic articulation, technological drive, organizational empowerment, and application implementation, and explores their heterogeneous effects on substantive and strategic innovation. The empirical results show that the degree of digital transformation has a significant positive relationship with substantive innovation but no significant effect on strategic innovation. By dimensions, technological push and application implementation are significantly positively related to substantive innovation, but organizational empowerment does not have a significant effect, and strategic declarations have a minimal marginal negative effect. More importantly, further investigation finds that technological push can contribute to both forms of innovations, while strategic declarations have a significant negative effect on both forms of innovations. On the whole, the benefits of innovation gained through digital transformation is mostly embodied in the improved quality of substantive innovation, while there is a huge gap between the two dimensions. This paper offers an empirical supplement to digital empowerment of innovation at the micro level from the perspective of structural deconstruction.
Downloads
References
[1] Guo, Y. (2018). Signal transmission mechanism of government innovation subsidies and firm innovation. China Industrial Economics, (9), 98–116.
[2] Hu, H. F., Dou, B., Zhao, J. L., et al. (2025). Corporate digital catering and business performance. The Journal of World Economy, 48(12), 209–236.
[3] Huang, B., Li, H. T., Liu, J. Q., et al. (2023). Digital technology innovation and high-quality development of Chinese enterprises: Evidence from corporate digital patents. Economic Research Journal, 58(3), 97–115.
[4] Huang, X. H., Sun, Y. M., & Chen, M. T. (2024). Corporate digital transformation and disruptive technological innovation: Micro evidence from patent networks and SBERT model. China Industrial Economics, (10), 137–154.
[5] Ji, Y. Y., Zhou, X., & Zhang, Q. (2023). Digital transformation and firm innovation: An analysis from the perspective of R&D investment and R&D efficiency. Journal of Financial Research, (4), 111–129.
[6] Li, W. J., & Zheng, M. N. (2016). Substantive innovation or strategic innovation? The impact of macro industrial policy on micro firm innovation. Economic Research Journal, 51(4), 60–73.
[7] Pang, R. Z., Liu, L., & Zhang, S. (2023). How does digitalization affect firm innovation? From the perspective of human capital and transaction cost transmission mechanisms. Nankai Economic Studies, (2), 102–120.
[8] Shang, H., Yang, Y., & Tian, X. R. (2026). Supply chain linkage effects of substantive innovation in key digital technologies. Science Research Management, 1–16. Advance online publication.
[9] Shen, G. B., & Yuan, Z. Y. (2020). Internetization, innovation protection, and the improvement of export product quality of Chinese firms. The Journal of World Economy, 43(11), 127–151.
[10] Song, H. S., Xue, X. R., & Huang, J. (2025). Research on the impact of corporate digital transformation structure on innovation strategies. Science Research Management, 46(3), 16–27.
[11] Tan, X. F., & Qian, J. Q. (2020). Capital market pressure and corporate strategic patent behavior: The perspective of short-selling mechanism. China Industrial Economics, (5), 156–173.
[12] Tang, S., Wu, X. C., & Zhu, J. (2020). Digital finance and enterprise technological innovation: Structural characteristics, mechanism identification, and effect differences under financial regulation. Management World, 36(5), 52–66+9.
[13] Wang, D., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Corporate digital transformation, strategic green innovation, and corporate environmental performance. Economic Research Journal, 59(10), 113–131.
[14] Wu, F., Hu, H. Z., Lin, H. Y., et al. (2021). Corporate digital transformation and capital market performance: Empirical evidence from stock liquidity. Management World, 37(7), 130–144+10.
[15] Xiao, X., Wang, J. M., & Dong, X. S. (2023). How does digital transformation affect substantive innovation in manufacturing? From the perspectives of "digital empowerment" and "digital divide". Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 53(10), 28–50.
[16] Xie, H. J., & Qi, X. (2026). Global cross-border digital M&A: Does distance still matter? Journal of Finance and Economics, 52(7), 124–138.
[17] Xie, J. P., Zheng, Y. S., & Han, Z. S. (2025). Business environment empowering digital transformation of manufacturing enterprises and improvement of independent innovation quality. R&D Management, 37(1), 14–30.
[18] Zhang, Z. N., Qian, X. Y., & Cao, X. W. (2023). Research on the green innovation effect of corporate digital transformation: Substantive innovation or strategic innovation? Industrial Economics Research, (1), 86–100.
[19] Zhen, H. X., Wang, X., & Fang, H. X. (2023). Administrative protection of intellectual property rights and corporate digital transformation. Economic Research Journal, 58(11), 62–79.
[20] Fan, Y. Z. (2025). The innovation effect of digital business model transformation orientation: Evidence from corporate cross-boundary innovation. International Review of Economics & Finance, 103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104578
[21] Ge, C. W., Lv, W. D., & Wang, J. L. (2023). The impact of digital technology innovation network embedding on firms' innovation performance: The role of knowledge acquisition and digital transformation. Sustainability, 15(8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086938
[22] Khanagha, S., Ansari, S., Paroutis, S., & Oviedo, L. (2022). Mutualism and the dynamics of new platform creation: A study of Cisco and Fog computing. Strategic Management Journal, 43(3), 476–506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3147
[23] Pi, A. B., Deng, S. Y., Zhao, W. F., & Wang, J. H. (2025). How does digital consumption affect corporate innovation activity? Evidence from China's information consumption pilot policy. Sustainability, 17(21). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219504
[24] Putra, F. H. R., Pandza, K., & Khanagha, S. (2024). Strategic leadership in liminal space: Framing exploration of digital opportunities at hierarchical interfaces. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 18(1), 165–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1465
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
