Research on the Evolution Trend of Community Governance Policy Path: -- A Textual Analysis Based on 131 Urban and Rural Community Policies (2013-2022)

Yangfan Bu

doi:10.54097/jid.v3i1.8429

Authors

Yangfan Bu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/jid.v3i1.8429

Keywords:

Community Governance, Policy Evolution, Policy Path

Abstract

Urban and rural communities are the cornerstone of society, and are related to the vital interests of the residents and the harmony and stability of society. Based on the perspective of policy change, this paper selects 131 policy documents related to urban and rural community governance since the modernization of national governance was proposed in 2013 as research samples, and establishes a three-dimensional analysis framework of "policy time-policy space-policy path" to analyze the evolution trend of the policy path of urban and rural community governance in China. The study found that, from the time dimension analysis, with the evolution of urban and rural community governance policies in China, the overall policy path showed a trend of single focus to diversified development, and gradually formed the policy development characteristics of "macro control-micro adjustment"; from the perspective of space Dimensional analysis shows that the country's central and local policy paths are in step, and there are significant "gradient" differences in different places. In general, the evolution trend of urban and rural community governance policy paths reflects the transformation of its governance philosophy and the continuous optimization of primary-level governance attention allocation, which coordinates and promotes the modernization of China's governance capabilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lu Weijing, Zhao Xiaoping Zhang Congcong, The Research of the Reasons and Countermeasure for Policy Failure of Urban Community Governance in China: from Policy Analysis Perspective[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2016(08):107-112.

Liu Wei. The Application of Content Analysis in the Research of Public Administration[J]. Chinese Public Administration, 2014, No.348(06):93-98.

Li Jiang, Liu Yuanhao, Huang Cui et al. Remolding the Policy Text Data through Documents Quantitative Research: The Formation, Transformation and Method Innovation of Policy Documents Quantitative Research[J]. Journal of Public Management,2015,12(02):138-144+159.

Wu Zijing, Zhang Ping. Influencing Factors and Mechanism of Urban Community Governance Effect--Based on the Survey Data of 1089 Communities in 20 Cities[J]. Probe, 2022, No.226(04):118-130.

Cao Haijun, Bao Cao. Community of Neighborhood Governance Construction--the Theoretical Logic and Realization Path of Institutionalized Neighborhood Governance in the New Era[J]. Theoretical Investigation, 2020, No.212(01):12-18.

Chen Rongzhuo, Liu Yanan. Co-Construction and Sharing: The Optimal Path of the Rural Community Governance Mechanism since the 18th CPC National Congress [J]. Socialism Studies, 2016, No.228(04):106-113.

Zhu Renxian, Wu Wenying. From Grid Management to Cooperative Governance: Analyzing the Evolution Path of Community Governance Model in China during the Transition Period[J]. Journal of Xiamen University (Arts & Social Sciences),2014, No.221(01):102-109.

Yan Zhilan, Dengzhiwei. Challenges and Path Innovation of Urban Community Governance in the Context of Social Construction[J]. The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute. 2014,15(04):40-48.

Heng xia, Chen xinyao. Research on the Evolutionary Characteristics of China's Rural Poverty Alleviation Policy-Based on the Content Analysis of the Central No.1 Document (1982-2019) [J]. Social Sciences in Xinjiang. 2020(03):122-130+152.

Bowles S, Gintis H. Social capital and community governance [J]. The economic journal, 2002, 112(483): 419-436.

Stewart J. A future for local authorities as community government [M]. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1989.