Sustainable Agricultural Management Strategies Based on Natural Processes and Human Decision-Making

Ying Zhu

doi:10.54097/yye8gx97

Authors

Ying Zhu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/yye8gx97

Keywords:

Organic Agriculture, Biodiversity Restoration, Lotka-Volterra Model, Dynamic System Theory.

Abstract

As agricultural land expands, constructing a sustainable and stable ecological balance has become a crucial issue in agricultural production. This paper aimed to track the evolution of ecosystems and the selection of agricultural patterns. We extended the Lotka-Volterra model under the premise of constructing five subsystems, based on the Logistic growth model, and optimizes the periodic changes of the ecosystem using the RK4 algorithm. Then a biodiversity recovery model is constructed based on the Lotka-Volterra model. Five key indicators are extracted to establish an ecosystem stability model based on dynamic system theory. A Lotka-Volterra model is constructed based on five factors affecting the ecosystem, and appropriate parameters are set to analyze the impact of organic agriculture. The paper details the ecological and economic impacts of shifting to organic agriculture. It suggests that farmers introduce species such as bats and birds for biological control, optimize resource management, and master organic agricultural techniques.

References

[1] Wu L, Huang K, Yu Y, et al. Addressing Regional Agricultural ecological Boundaries: An Integrated Environmental Footprint Framework for Revealing Sustainability Gaps in Agroecosystems. [J]. Environmental science & technology, 2025.

[2] Xu H, He X, Chen J, et al. Soil nutrient limitation controls trophic cascade effects of micro-food web-derived ecological functions in degraded agroecosystems. [J]. Journal of advanced research, 2025.

[3] Ibrahim M, Krishna K B, Fraser D E. Bridging the gap in sustainability measurement and reporting for agroecosystems: Overview and development of an adaptive sustainability assessment and monitoring framework[J]. Ecological Indicators,2025,170113091-113091.

[4] Jumpah T E, Adams A, Ratinger T, et al. Agroecological dimension of sustainable intensification technologies adoption in northern Ghana[J]. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 2024,1 0(1):

[5] O’ Connor T, García G O, Cabral V, et al. Agroecological farmer perceptions and opinions towards pest management and biodiversity in the Argentine Pampa region[J]. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 2025, 49(2): 182-203.

[6] Kodali S, Lopez F C, Lobdell I, et al. A Case of One Step Forward and Two Steps Back? An Examination of Herbicide-Resistant Weed Management Using a Simple Agroecosystem Dynamics Model[J]. Systems, 2024, 12(12): 587-587.

[7] Belay T, Lebeza M T. Livelihood vulnerability of rural households to climate variability and change: An agroecological system-based approach in northwestern Ethiopia[J]. Heliyon, 2024, 10(23): e40570-e40570.

[8] Laasli E S, Lahlali R, Dababat A A, et al. Soil health in Moroccan olive agroecosystems: The bioindication role of terrestrial nematode dynamics[J]. Heliyon, 2024, 10(23): e40715-e40715.

[9] Petraki D, Kanatas P, Zannopoulos S, et al. Agroecological Weed Management and the Potential Role of Fungi-Based Bioherbicides in Conservation: Advantages, Applications and Future Prospects[J]. Conservation, 2024, 4(4): 847-859.

[10] N’ tie B T, Kasseney D B, Gomina M, et al. Role of windbreaks on ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) conservation in a cotton-growing agroecosystem of the humid savannah in Togo[J]. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology, 2025, 28(1): 102349-102349.