AI-Based Financial Risk Models for Reliability of Mechanical Prosthetics and Assistive Devices

Authors

  • Yao Ge

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/jmhdd902

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Financial Risk Modeling, Prosthetics Reliability, Assistive Devices, Machine Learning, Healthcare Economics, Insurance Analytics, Predictive Maintenance, Medical Device Finance

Abstract

The increasing sophistication of mechanical prosthetics and assistive devices has created complex financial risk environments that traditional actuarial models struggle to address comprehensively, particularly regarding long-term reliability, maintenance costs, and user outcome variability across diverse populations. This research develops advanced Artificial Intelligence (AI) based financial risk assessment frameworks specifically designed for mechanical prosthetics and assistive technologies, integrating machine learning algorithms with comprehensive reliability engineering principles to provide accurate cost prediction and risk quantification for insurance providers, healthcare systems, and device manufacturers. The proposed AI models incorporate multi-dimensional data sources including device performance metrics, user biomechanical data, environmental operating conditions, maintenance histories, and clinical outcomes to generate sophisticated risk profiles that account for the complex interdependencies affecting device reliability and associated financial exposures. Through extensive analysis of 23,847 prosthetic devices across 156 healthcare facilities representing 12 countries and $2.8 billion in total device value, our AI framework demonstrates remarkable improvements in risk prediction accuracy by 41.2%, cost forecasting precision enhancement of 38.7%, and claim frequency prediction reliability improvement of 34.9% compared to traditional actuarial approaches. The system successfully processes real-time sensor data from connected prosthetics to provide dynamic risk assessment updates, enabling proactive maintenance scheduling that reduces catastrophic failure rates by 67% while decreasing total cost of ownership by 29%. Machine learning models trained on comprehensive datasets encompassing device specifications, user demographics, activity patterns, and environmental conditions achieve mean absolute percentage errors below 12.3% for five-year cost projections and 8.7% for two-year reliability forecasting across diverse prosthetic categories. The framework incorporates advanced uncertainty quantification through ensemble methods and Bayesian neural networks, providing probabilistic risk assessments with calibrated confidence intervals that satisfy regulatory requirements for medical device financial modeling. Real-time adaptation capabilities enable continuous model refinement based on emerging device data, technological improvements, and evolving user needs, with model recalibration achieving convergence within 48 hours of new data integration. The AI system demonstrates superior performance across diverse prosthetic technologies including myoelectric limbs, mechanical joints, cochlear implants, and mobility assistance devices while maintaining interpretability standards required for healthcare financial decision-making.

References

[1] Bates, T. J., Fergason, J. R., & Pierrie, S. N. (2020). Technological advances in prosthesis design and rehabilitation following upper extremity limb loss. Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 13(4), 485-493.

[2] Tse, Y. K. (2023). Nonlife actuarial models: theory, methods and evaluation. Cambridge University Press.

[3] Salgado Manrique, J. S., & Cifuentes-De la Portilla, C. (2025). Exploring Opportunities for Advancements in Lower Limb Socket Fabrication and Testing: A Review. Biomechanics, 5(3), 64.

[4] Karim, M. R., Siddiqui, M. I. H., Assaifan, A. K., Aijaz, M. O., & Alnaser, I. A. (2024). Nanotechnology and prosthetic devices: Integrating biomedicine and materials science for enhanced performance and adaptability. Journal of Disability Research, 3(3), 20240019.

[5] Malcangi, M. (2020). AI-based methods and technologies to develop wearable devices for prosthetics and predictions of degenerative diseases. In Artificial Neural Networks (pp. 337-354). New York, NY: Springer US.

[6] Souaifi, M., Dhahbi, W., Jebabli, N., Ceylan, H. İ., Boujabli, M., Muntean, R. I., & Dergaa, I. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Sports Biomechanics: A Scoping Review on Wearable Technology, Motion Analysis, and Injury Prevention. Bioengineering, 12(8), 887.

[7] Al-karawi, K. A. (2023). Internet of Things (IoT) about disabilities: disabilities in relation to the Internet of Things (IoT). ScienceOpen Preprints.

[8] Marcão, R., Monteiro, S., Santos, V., Martinho, F., Sousa, M. J., Dionísio, A., & Ramos, P. (2024). Optimizing Healthcare Delivery: Innovations and Economic Strategies in Medical Device Management. In Electronic Health Records-Issues and Challenges in Healthcare Systems. IntechOpen.

[9] Donnelley, C. A., Shirley, C., Von Kaeppler, E. P., Hetherington, A., Albright, P. D., Morshed, S., & Shearer, D. W. (2021). Cost analyses of prosthetic devices: a systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 102(7), 1404-1415.

[10] Baumann, M. F., Frank, D., Kulla, L. C., & Stieglitz, T. (2020). Obstacles to prosthetic care—legal and ethical aspects of access to upper and lower limb prosthetics in Germany and the improvement of prosthetic care from a social perspective. Societies, 10(1), 10.

[11] Cabrera, I. A., Pike, T. C., McKittrick, J. M., Meyers, M. A., Rao, R. R., & Lin, A. Y. (2021). Digital healthcare technologies: Modern tools to transform prosthetic care. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 18(sup1), 129-144.

[12] Anjum, S. (2025). STEM-Based Innovations in AI-Enabled Prosthetics: Toward Smarter Biomechanical Systems. Journal of STEM Research, 2(1), 27-35.

[13] Dubei, O. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Impact on Risk Management (based on «COR-Medical» case) (Doctoral dissertation, Private Higher Educational Establishment-Institute “Ukrainian-American Concordia University").

[14] Reynolds, E. (2024). Machine Learning-Integrated Medical Devices in Australia: Safety Defects and Regulation.

[15] Manchadi, O., Ben-Bouazza, F. E., & Jioudi, B. (2023). Predictive maintenance in healthcare system: a survey. IEEE Access, 11, 61313-61330.

[16] Chadwell, A., Diment, L., Micó-Amigo, M., Morgado Ramírez, D. Z., Dickinson, A., Granat, M., ... & Worsley, P. (2020). Technology for monitoring everyday prosthesis use: a systematic review. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 17(1), 93.

[17] Amudhan, K., Vasanthanathan, A., & Anish Jafrin Thilak, J. (2022). An insight into Transfemoral Prostheses: Materials, modelling, simulation, fabrication, testing, clinical evaluation and performance perspectives. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 19(2), 123-140.

[18] Hill, I., Chanawala, P., Singh, R., Sheikholeslam, S. A., & Ivanov, A. (2021). CMOS reliability from past to future: A survey of requirements, trends, and prediction methods. IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability, 22(1), 1-18.

[19] Thethi, S. K. (2024). Machine learning models for cost-effective healthcare delivery systems: A global perspective. Digital Transformation in Healthcare, 5, 199.

[20] Zouo, S. J. C., & Olamijuwon, J. (2024). Financial data analytics in healthcare: A review of approaches to improve efficiency and reduce costs. Open Access Research Journal of Science and Technology, 12(2), 10-19.

[21] World Health Organization. (2025). Health technology assessment of medical devices. World Health Organization.

[22] Sarkhosh, H. (2024). Optimization of Financial Resources Allocation in Medical Device Production Companies through Artificial Intelligence: An Integrated Approach (Doctoral dissertation, Technische Universität Wien).

[23] Wu, H., Dyson, M., & Nazarpour, K. (2022). Internet of Things for beyond-the-laboratory prosthetics research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 380(2228), 20210005.

[24] Abdulhussain, S. H., Mahmmod, B. M., Alwhelat, A., Shehada, D., Shihab, Z. I., Mohammed, H. J., ... & Hussain, A. (2025). A Comprehensive Review of Sensor Technologies in IoT: Technical Aspects, Challenges, and Future Directions. Computers, 14(8), 342.

[25] Alluhydan, K., Siddiqui, M. I. H., & Elkanani, H. (2023). Functionality and comfort design of lower-limb prosthetics: A review. Journal of Disability Research, 2(3), 10-23.

[26] Kelley, M. A., Benz, H., Engdahl, S., & Bridges, J. F. (2019). Identifying the benefits and risks of emerging integration methods for upper limb prosthetic devices in the United States: an environmental scan. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 16(7), 631-641.

[27] Yang, H., & Jiang, Z. (2024). Decision support for personalized therapy in implantable medical devices: A digital twin approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 243, 122883.

[28] Cancela, J., Charlafti, I., Colloud, S., & Wu, C. (2021). Digital health in the era of personalized healthcare: opportunities and challenges for bringing research and patient care to a new level. Digital Health, 7-31.

[29] Srinivasagopalan, L. N. (2022). AI-enhanced fraud detection in healthcare insurance: A novel approach to combatting financial losses through advanced machine learning models. European Journal of Advances in Engineering and Technology, 9(8), 82-91.

[30] Nelson, J. (2025). Validation and Testing of AI Models: Ensuring Reliability and Accuracy in Predicting Heart Failure Exacerbations.

[31] Gao, H., Zahedi, M., Jiang, W., Lin, H. Y., Davis, J., & Treude, C. (2025). AI Safety in the Eyes of the Downstream Developer: A First Look at Concerns, Practices, and Challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.19444.

[32] Panagoulias, D. P., Tsihrintzis, G. A., & Virvou, M. (2025). Challenges in Regulating and Validating AI-Driven Healthcare. In Artificial Intelligence-Empowered Bio-medical Applications (pp. 135-152). Springer, Cham.

[33] Shi, C. (2025). Towards trustworthy and explainable AI: applications in healthcare (Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia).

[34] Elhaddad, M., & Hamam, S. (2024). AI-driven clinical decision support systems: an ongoing pursuit of potential. Cureus, 16(4).

[35] Anklam, E., Bahl, M. I., Ball, R., Beger, R. D., Cohen, J., Fitzpatrick, S., ... & Slikker Jr, W. (2022). Emerging technologies and their impact on regulatory science. Experimental Biology and Medicine, 247(1), 1-75.

Downloads

Published

30-09-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ge, Y. (2025). AI-Based Financial Risk Models for Reliability of Mechanical Prosthetics and Assistive Devices. Mathematical Modeling and Algorithm Application, 6(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.54097/jmhdd902