Optimization of Multi-Factor NIPT Detection Time Points Based on Random Forest Feature Screening and K-Means Clustering

Authors

  • Xuejian Liu
  • Yifan Xue
  • Wenwu Deng

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/7qefvd77

Keywords:

Random Forest, K-Means Clustering, NIPT, Multi-Factor Optimization, Detection Time Point.

Abstract

Aiming at the problems that multiple factors (BMI, age, etc.) synergistically affect the detection time point in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and the accuracy of the existing single-factor optimization schemes is insufficient, this paper proposes a multi-factor optimization scheme of "random forest feature screening - K-means clustering - risk - compliance rate constraint". The study was based on the NIPT data of male fetuses from the prenatal diagnosis center of a tertiary hospital. After preprocessing (cleaning abnormal samples, standardizing gestational weeks format, and calculating derived indicators), random forest was used to screen the key factors affecting the attainment of Y chromosome concentration standards, and then multi-factor homogeneous grouping was achieved through K-means clustering. Finally, the optimal detection time points for each group were screened in combination with the principle of "compliance rate ≥85% and lowest risk", and the impact of detection errors was analyzed. The results show that random forest effectively identifies the key influencing factors and eliminates the interference of redundant variables. K-means achieves efficient grouping. The compliance rate of the optimal detection time points in each group meets the clinical requirements, and the time deviation is small when the detection error is ≤3%. This scheme can precisely match the differences of multiple factors, solve the problems of feature redundancy and inefficient grouping, and provide reliable decision support for the timing planning of NIPT clinical testing.

References

[1]Xie J, Jiang Y, Zhou Y, et al. Hierarchical Classification of Factors Associated With Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Failures and Its Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes[J]. Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.), 2024, 6(4): 215-224.

[2]McMahon G, Kennedy S, Miremberg H, et al. Non-invasive prenatal testing: Assessing the availability and accessibility of information available to the pregnant population within the Republic of Ireland[J]. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2024, 302149-154.

[3]Qin S, Zhao Y, Deng F, et al. Performance evaluation of noninvasive prenatal testing on 24 chromosomes in a cohort of 118,969 pregnant women in Sichuan, China[J]. The Journal of international medical research, 2024, 52(9): 3000605241274584.

[4]Ye S, Xiu F Z, Jing W, et al. Noninvasive prenatal testing for the detection of fetal chromosome 17 microduplication: clinical implications and findings[J]. Molecular Cytogenetics, 2024, 17(1):10-10.

[5]Konya M, Czimbalmos A, Loczi L, et al. Genome-Wide, Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for rare chromosomal abnormalities: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy[J]. PloS one, 2024, 19(11): e0308008.

[6]Zhengyi X, Ran Z,Yiyun X, et al. Residual risk of clinically significant copy number variations in fetuses with nasal bone absence or hypoplasia after excluding non-invasive prenatal screening-detectable findings[J]. Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry, 2023, 553117744-117744.

[7]Becking C E, Scheffer G P, Henrichs J, et al. Fetal fraction of cell-free DNA in noninvasive prenatal testing and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a nationwide retrospective cohort study of 56, 110 pregnant women[J]. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2023, 231(2): 244.e1-244.e18.

[8]M I B, Lidewij H, H E V V, et al. Psychological impact of additional findings detected by genome-wide Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): TRIDENT-2 study[J]. European journal of human genetics: EJHG, 2023, 32(3): 302-308.

Downloads

Published

20-10-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Liu, X., Xue, Y., & Deng, W. (2025). Optimization of Multi-Factor NIPT Detection Time Points Based on Random Forest Feature Screening and K-Means Clustering. Mathematical Modeling and Algorithm Application, 6(2), 87-90. https://doi.org/10.54097/7qefvd77