Research on Hybrid Intelligent Optimization Methods for Smoke Jammer Effectiveness in Single-UAV Multi-Payload Coordination
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/0hejzd49Keywords:
Smoke jammer; Multi-payload coordination optimization; Hybrid intelligent algorithms.Abstract
This paper aims to design an optimal strategy for a single FY1 drone to execute smoke countermeasures against an incoming M1 missile. First, three-dimensional kinematic models of the missile, drone, and smoke grenade were constructed. Using triple geometric criteria—line-of-sight distance—trajectory crossing—points within the cloud—the effective shielding duration of a single grenade under fixed parameters was calculated to be approximately 1.42 seconds. Second, for the optimal deployment strategy of a single smoke grenade, the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm is employed for global search. Setting the decision variable dimension to 4 dimensions significantly increases the optimal masking duration to 4.62 seconds. Finally, for the coordinated deployment of three smoke-interference grenades, the model was expanded to an 8-dimensional decision variable space. A hybrid optimization framework combining differential evolution with simulated annealing (basinhopping/L-BFGS-B) was introduced to address the non-smoothness and multi-modal nature of the objective function. This hybrid strategy fully accounted for constraints like a 1-second deployment interval, ultimately achieving a total effective masking duration of 9.820 seconds—over 110% longer than the single-deployment optimal solution. This demonstrates the synergistic potential of multi-deployment coordination in complex adversarial scenarios.
References
[1]Lu Y, Huang Q. DRST-Net: A Dual-Branch Feature Fusion Network Combining ResNet50 and Swin Transformer for Welding Light Strip Recognition[J]. Applied Sciences, 2025, 15(4): 2016-2016.
[2]Tan Y, Zha B, Weng J, et al. Research on laser detection method against smoke and dust interference based on polarization modulation[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2024, 2891(14): 142028-142028.
[3]Mohammady S, Erratt J K, Creed F I. Tracking Phytoplankton Biomass Amid Wildfire Smoke Interference Using Landsat 8 OLI[J]. Remote Sensing, 2024, 16(19): 3605-3605.
[4]Guo Z, Yang B, Wu K, et al. FMCW Laser Fuze Structure with Multi-Channel Beam Based on 3D Particle Collision Scattering Model under Smoke Interference[J]. Sensors, 2024, 24(16): 5395-5395.
[5]Xu C, Zha B, Zhang R, et al. Echo characteristics of pulsed lasers in non-uniform smoke environments.[J]. Optics express, 2024, 32(14): 24222-24241.
[6]Liangquan W, Fei S, Deren K. An image processing method for an explosion field fireball based on edge recursion[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2022, 33(9).
[7]Zhe G, Bing Y, Yanbin L, et al. Virtual Simulation of the Effect of FMCW Laser Fuse Detector’s Component Performance Variability on Target Echo Characteristics under Smoke Interference[J]. Materials, 2022, 15(12): 4268-4268.
[8]Nitish U, Srinivas B, Kai H. Multilaser Load Balancing in Additive Manufacturing[J]. INFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics, 2022, 52(4).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Likun Cui

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







