Mechanism of n-Hexane Insolubles in Biomass-Coal Co-Pyrolysis and Optimization of Their Mixing Ratios

Xiaoyu Liu

doi:10.54097/ns1x4c45

Authors

Xiaoyu Liu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ns1x4c45

Keywords:

Spearman correlation analysis; Analysis of variance; SLSQP algorithm.

Abstract

This study thoroughly investigates the influence mechanism of n-hexane insolubles (INS) and their blending ratio on product yields during the co-pyrolysis of biomass and coal. First, Spearman's correlation coefficient analysis revealed intrinsic relationships between INS content and yields of tar, water, and char. Results indicate significant correlations between INS and tar/char yields, while its effect on water yield is negligible. Subsequently, to further elucidate yield variation patterns under complex operating conditions, variance analysis was employed to investigate the interactive effects of INS and blending ratios on product yields. Findings revealed that different INS-blend combinations significantly altered tar growth rates and coke residue decline trends. Building upon these findings, a nonlinear optimization model was constructed to maximize energy conversion efficiency and product utilization. The Sequential Quadratic Programming (SLSQP) algorithm was employed to identify optimal blending ratios and INS dosage under specified cost and technical constraints. The research outcomes provide scientific theoretical foundations and operational guidance for optimizing biomass energy utilization, enhancing energy efficiency, and achieving sustainable energy production.

References

[1] Kristanto J, Azis M M, Purwono S. Enhancing machine learning prediction of biomass pyrolysis yields through taxonomy-based preprocessing and rigorous model tuning[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2026, 205108524-108524.

[2] Yani A, Wijayanti W, Sasongko N M, et al. Synergistic co-pyrolysis of polyethylene terephthalate and hibiscus rosa-sinensis: Catalytic mechanisms for optimizing pyrolysis yields[J]. South African Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2025, 53281-302.

[3] Nagawkar R B, Subramaniam S, Brown C R, et al. Computational models for the prediction of yields in the autothermal pyrolysis of biomass[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2025, 311121599-121599.

[4] Mariyam S, Alherbawi M, McKay G, et al. A predictive model for biomass waste pyrolysis yield: Exploring the correlation of proximate analysis and product composition[J]. Energy Conversion and Management: X, 2025, 25100831-100831.

[5] Ma H, Zhang Y, Qiu L, et al. Effect of Reaction Conditions on Energy Yield of Pyrolysis Gas from Apple Tree Branches[J]. ACS omega, 2024, 9(26): 28028-28036.

[6] Elhenawy Y, Fouad K, Bassyouni M, et al. Yield and energy outputs analysis of sawdust biomass pyrolysis[J]. Energy Conversion and Management: X, 2024, 22100583-.

[7] Ikhlass. B, S. A, F. T. Modelling and simulation of fast pyrolysis of pomace from three-phase olive mill targeting optimal yields of pyrolysis products[J]. Biofuels, 2024, 15(3): 349-361.

[8] Arumugam B D, Ganesan C M. Characterization of cassia fistula seed and shell co-pyrolysis yield optimization by response surface methodology and compositional analysis[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2024, 184355-376.

[9] Rodrigues L, Budai A, Elsgaard L, et al. The importance of biochar quality and pyrolysis yield for soil carbon sequestration in practice[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2023, 74(4).

[10] Jun P Y, Hu T L, Hao L, et al. Effect of coal tar pitch modification on the structure and char yield of pyrolysis epoxy resin carbons[J]. Diamond & Related Materials, 2023, 137.