Research on Intelligent Detection of Container Surface Damage Based on Deep Residual Networks

Authors

  • Haoyang Zhu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/jajq1474

Keywords:

Deep Residual Network, Binary Classification, Ensemble Learning.

Abstract

Addressing the issues of low efficiency and high subjectivity in container damage detection during automated port operations, this study employs deep residual networks to construct a high-precision system for determining the presence or absence of container damage. Based on a dataset of 3,713 images, the approach achieves the goal of extracting key damage features from complex port backgrounds by converting original YOLO annotations into binary classification labels. Targeted data augmentation strategies, including geometric and illumination transformations, were employed to address challenges such as reflections, shadows, and multi-scale damage in real-world scenarios. The model architecture incorporates three residual blocks, global average pooling, and a Sigmoid output layer, with skip connections effectively mitigating gradient vanishing during deep training. Experiments employed 3-fold hierarchical cross-validation and ensemble learning strategies, incorporating label smoothing and early stopping mechanisms to optimize training. Results demonstrate the model achieves 99.39% accuracy, 100% precision, and 99.39% recall on the validation set, while maintaining only 2.81 million parameters. This significantly enhances detection robustness and stability, providing reliable technical support for smart port development.

References

[1] Si Y, Xu W, Yang Z, et al. Intelligent surface roughness detection for deep-hole drilling based on pyramid adaptive transformer with MSST data fusion[J]. Measurement, 2026, 261119878-119878.

[2] Chen B, Gao J, Sun H, et al. Application of surface-enhanced Raman scattering combined with artificial intelligence for multiplex detection of chemotherapeutic agents used in solid tumors.[J]. Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025, (prepublish): 1-18.

[3] Zheng B, Yang Y. AE-YOLO: Research and Application of the YOLOv11-Based Lightweight Improved Model in Photovoltaic Panel Surface Intelligent Defect Detection[J]. Materials, 2025, 18(23): 5404-5404.

[4] Wekalao J, Shamsan A Z, Kamani T, et al. Smart graphene metasurface biosensor: Machine learning-assisted optimization for glucose detection[J]. Micro and Nanostructures, 2026, 210208479-208479.

[5] Tang A, Chen Y. Intelligent detection technology of machined surface materials based on image nonlinear processing algorithm[J]. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 2025, 5(1): 345-345.

[6] Hoefgeest R S, Hoefgeest R M, Garcia D, et al. Generating realistic 3D surface defects for training AI-Based industrial inspection systems[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2025,141(9-10):1-19.

[7] Li J, Long H, Liu M, et al. Smartphone screen surface defect detection using dynamic large separable kernel attention and multi-scale feature bi-directional path aggregation network[J]. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15(1):40620-40620.

[8] Ren F, Xu L, Fei J, et al. Design of multi-mode intelligent system architecture for surface defect detection of steel based on cloud technology[J]. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15(1): 39735-39735.

[9] Wu M, Benoit L, Nadala C, et al. Validation of the OnSiteĀ® Gluten Test Kit for Detection of Gluten in Select Foods and Environmental Surfaces: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 012501. [J]. Journal of AOAC International, 2025, 108(6): 943-960.

[10] Yang Y, Zhang Q, Ji Y, et al. An Intelligent Robotic System for Surface Defect Detection on Stay Cables: Mechanical Design and Defect Recognition Framework[J]. Buildings, 2025, 15(21): 3907-3907.

Downloads

Published

23-03-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zhu, H. (2026). Research on Intelligent Detection of Container Surface Damage Based on Deep Residual Networks. Mathematical Modeling and Algorithm Application, 8(3), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.54097/jajq1474