The Impact of Ambivalent Sexism and Related Factors

Authors

  • Ziyan Zhou

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v22i.13395

Keywords:

Ambivalent sexism, hostile sexism, benevolent sexism, egalitarianism.

Abstract

This article explores the impact of ambivalent sexist attitudes at the national, social, and individual levels. To begin from the definition, development, and significance of ambivalent sexism theory, by exploring the perceptions of hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes on male and female beliefs about well-being, life satisfaction, parenting responsibilities and housework assignments, and interpersonal status and behavioral responses to study society's pervasive ideology of poor outcomes between women's identities and successful performance in roles. It is important to note that both benevolent and hostile sexism harm gender equality because they harm men, women, and non-binary people based on traditional gender stereotypes that mask social biases, and even these normative standards of behavior can further promote gender bias. This study explores the impact of ambivalent sexism on male and female individuals and their relationships, hoping to contribute some theoretical research to future science development and progress, thereby promoting the spread of gender egalitarianism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dardenne B., Dumont M., Bollier T. Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: Consequences for women's performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2007, 93(5): 764-779.

Hopcroft R. L. The evolution of sex discrimination. Psychology, Evolution & Gender, 2002, 4(1): 43-67.

Gaunt R., Pinho M. Do sexist mothers change more diapers? Ambivalent sexism, maternal gatekeeping, and the division of childcare. Sex Roles, 2017, 79(3-4): 176-189.

Denmark F., Paludi M. A. Psychology of women: Handbook of issues and theories. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2007.

Saunders B. A., Scaturro C., Guarino C., Kelly, E. Contending with catcalling: The role of system-justifying beliefs and ambivalent sexism in predicting women’s coping experiences with (and men’s attributions for) stranger harassment. Current Psychology, 2017, 36: 324-338.

Jost J. T. Banaji M. R. The role of stereotyping in system justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 1994, 33: 1–27.

Lari N. Ambivalent Sexism in the State of Qatar: Gender Roles and Patriarchal Attitudes. Hawwa, 2023, 1: 1-20.

Gerst K., Reifman A., Niehuis S., Weiser D. How Do Spouses’ Levels of Ambivalent Sexism Predict Allocations of Household Chores? Probing Why Women Still Perform Most of the Work in the US. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 2021, 15(2): 167-182.

Paulhus D. L., Williams K. M. The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. J. Res. Pers., 2002, 36: 556–563.

Navas M. P., Maneiro L., Cutrín O., Gómez-Fraguela J. A., Sobral J. Associations between dark triad and ambivalent sexism: Sex differences among adolescents. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020, 17(21): 7754.

Ako-Brew A. Recognition of Gender Microaggressions in the Workplace: The Case of Predisposition and Propensity to Recognize. University of Missouri-Saint Louis, 2020.

Downloads

Published

26-11-2023

How to Cite

Zhou, Z. (2023). The Impact of Ambivalent Sexism and Related Factors. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 22, 785-789. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v22i.13395