The Current Situation of and Solutions to Appearance Discrimination: An Example from the Financial Industry

Authors

  • Yiwen Gong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/2c2c0580

Keywords:

Beauty premium; Appearance discrimination; Workplace discrimination; Finance industry.

Abstract

The beauty premium is increasingly mentioned in today's society, as relevant social surveys and academic studies have shown that better-looking people are generally more likely to have higher salaries and better promotion opportunities in the workplace. Appearance discrimination has evolved into an "unwritten rule" in the workplace, which has never made any real improvements. Therefore, this paper takes the financial industry as an example through collating the literature and case studies and taking into account the characteristics of the financial industry, we have come up with the characteristics and the current situation of appearance discrimination in this industry. Meanwhile, this paper focuses on exploring feasible ways to solve the problem of appearance discrimination from the three perspectives of law, company and individuals, which is of practical significance in finding and providing solutions to improve appearance discrimination in the workplace. We hope that through this paper, readers will gain a better understanding of the current situation of appearance discrimination and be able to be sensible and courageous in defending their rights in the face of such discrimination.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Deryugina, T., & Shurchkov, O. (2015). Now you see it, now you don’t: The vanishing beauty premium. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 116, 331-345.

Póvoa, Angela Cristiane Santos, Pech, W., Viacava, Juan José Camou, & Schwartz, M. T. (2020). is the beauty premium accessible to all? An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 78.

Granleese, J., & Sayer, G. (2006). Gendered ageism and “lookism”: A triple jeopardy for female academics. Women in Management Review, 21(6), 500-517.

Peng, L., Wang, X., & Ying, S. (2020). The heterogeneity of beauty premium in China: Evidence from CFPS. Economic Modelling, 90, 386-396.

Borland, J. , & Leigh, A. (2014). Unpacking the beauty premium: what channels does it operate through, and has it changed over time? Economic Record, 90(288), 17-32.

Petrie, A. R. (2008). Beauty, gender and stereotypes: evidence from laboratory experiments. Journal of Economic Psychology.

Bóo, F. L., Rossi, M. A., & Urzúa, S. S. (2013). The labor market return to an attractive face: Evidence from a field experiment. Economics Letters, 118(1), 170-172.

Robins, P. K., Homer, J. F., & French, M. T. (2011). Beauty and the labor market: Accounting for the additional effects of personality and grooming. Labour, 25(2), 228-251.

Gu, T., & Ji, Y. (2019). Beauty premium in China's labor market: Is discrimination the main reason?. China Economic Review, 57, 101335.

Scholz, J. K., & Sicinski, K. (2015). Facial attractiveness and lifetime earnings: Evidence from a cohort study. Review of Economics and Statistics, 97(1), 14-28.

Downloads

Published

05-03-2024