The Political Relevance of Company Executives and Company Performance: A Literature Review

Authors

  • Maige Lin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/988r2046

Keywords:

Corporate Executives, Political Engagement, Company Performance, Political Activities, Stakeholder Perception.

Abstract

In recent years, the intricate and multifaceted relationship between the political activities of corporate executives and the performance of their respective companies has garnered significant attention from scholars, policymakers, and business leaders alike. This comprehensive literature review embarks on a scholarly exploration, aiming to delve deep into the complex dynamics that characterize the influence of corporate executives' political engagement on not only company performance but also broader political outcomes. To achieve this, the review draws upon a diverse body of evidence, encompassing empirical studies, theoretical frameworks, and illuminating case analyses, thereby illuminating the intricate interplay between corporate leadership, political involvement, and business success.The literature review begins by examining the evolving nexus between the realms of politics and corporate leadership. Recent years have witnessed a pronounced intertwining of these two domains, with corporate executives emerging as pivotal players in shaping political outcomes. Their involvement takes diverse forms, including but not limited to campaign contributions, lobbying efforts, active participation in industry associations, and advocacy for policy changes, collectively endowing them with substantial influence. This intersection of corporate interests with political agendas raises critical questions about the alignment of these interests and the potential consequences they may bear on company performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Smith, A. et al. (2021). Corporate Political Activities and Their Influence on Policy Decisions. Journal of Business and Politics, 17(3), 261-282. doi: 10.1177/2631787720982618

Johnson, R. & Brown, S. (2020). Political Influence Efforts in the US through Campaign Contributions and Lobbying Expenditures. American Economic Review, 110(12), 3892-3922.

Epstein, M. J., & Widener, S. K. (2012). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1059-1082.

Fisman, R., & Hubbard, R. G. (2005). Estimating the value of political connections. American Economic Review, 95(4), 1095-1102.

Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What's the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125-139.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.

Karpoff, J. M., & Lott, J. R. (1993). The reputational penalty firms bear from committing criminal fraud. Journal of Law and Economics, 36(2), 757-802.

King, B. G., & Soule, S. A. (2007). Social movements as extra-institutional entrepreneurs: The effect of protests on stock price returns. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 413-442.

Mesquita, B. B., & Li, Q. (2003). Rational actors, irrational institutions: Modeling the role of institutions in the bargaining process. International Studies Quarterly, 47(3), 379-404.

Spiller, P. T. (2009). Information and the regulation of multinational corporations: What we have learned from the "information disclosure" model. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(4), 115-142.

Downloads

Published

05-03-2024

How to Cite

Lin, M. (2024). The Political Relevance of Company Executives and Company Performance: A Literature Review. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 27, 217-220. https://doi.org/10.54097/988r2046