Enhancing Learning Efficiency: Strategies for High School and College Students

Authors

  • Kun Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/srf4xq35

Keywords:

Learning efficiency, learning motivation, aggressiveness

Abstract

Learning efficiency has always been an important topic in teaching, and there are many factors that affect learninge fficiency. In order to figure out which factors affect learning efficiency more. In this study, 105 high school and college students were surveyed by questionnaire to explore the methods to improve learning efficiency. The results have shown that study method is an important factor in improving study efficiency because the appropriate study method helps to understand the knowledge better. Most people believe that studying in the morning helps to improve learning efficiency. Learning rich in goals and learning motivation can greatly improve learning efficiency, such as focusing attention, arranging time wisely, and designating learning planning. In addition to the questionnaire, the literature method was also used to summarize that: conditions that slow down the pace of learning tend to improve retention later in the day. Four principles for improving memory: actively processing material, practicing retrieval, using distributed practice, and using metamemory.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. B. Doris, and J. V. Hamby. TCH. 68.4. 257-261 (1995)

C. A. David, A. J. Levinson, and S. G. AIHSE. 15. 55-770 (2010)

S. L. Bennett. IJCPS. 21.1. 7. (2011)

E. E, B. Thomas., and J. C. CAIS. 42.1. 21. (2018).

M. B. Kathleen, and C. L. Zerr. CDPS. 28.6. 607-613. (2019)

D. John. PSPI. 14.1. 4-58. (2013)

R. L. Henry, and A. C. Butler. TCS. 15.1. 20-27. (2011)

D. Yeh, Y. P. Soo. JSE. 72. 882-889. (2005)

T. Rasch, W. Schnotz. 19. 411-422. (2009)

J. Katona, A. Kovari. 15. 251-280. (2018)

Downloads

Published

05-03-2024

How to Cite

Zhang, K. (2024). Enhancing Learning Efficiency: Strategies for High School and College Students. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 27, 501-512. https://doi.org/10.54097/srf4xq35