The Influencing Factors of High School English Teachers Choosing Different Teaching Media

Authors

  • Purui Si

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/j1z7da32

Keywords:

High school English teaching, grounded theory, educational technology, urban-rural disparities, professional development.

Abstract

The issue of high school English teachers' selection of teaching media has garnered widespread attention. However, there remain significant gaps in understanding the influencing factors. This paper analyzes the determinants behind teachers' choices using grounded theory and three-level coding, incorporating interviews with educators from both first-tier cities and county towns in China. The findings reveal substantial disparities in resource availability, technological proficiency, and institutional support between urban and rural schools. Urban teachers benefit from abundant resources and robust technical support, which facilitate higher technological proficiency and more effective media integration with curriculum goals. Conversely, rural teachers face challenges with basic access to technology and limited professional development opportunities. Based on these findings, this paper proposes several recommendations to optimize the use of teaching media: enhancing resource availability through increased funding and community support, improving technological proficiency via targeted professional development, strengthening school support with dedicated IT staff and flexible funding policies, and aligning media with curriculum needs to enhance student engagement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. Report on the Development of China's Education System. Beijing: Ministry of Education, 2022.

Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. National Educational Statistics Yearbook 2022. Beijing: Ministry of Education, 2023.

Glaser B G, Strauss A L. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014

Chen X M. Exploration of the application of grounded theory in Chinese educational research. Peking University Education Review, 2015, 13 (01): 2 - 15+188.

Chen, X M. Qualitative research methods and social science research. Beijing: Educational Science Publishing House, 2000: 327, 333.

Davis F D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 1989, 13 (3): 319 - 340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

UNESCO. The challenges and opportunities of Artificial Intelligence in education, 2023. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/challenges-and-opportunities-artificial-intelligence-education.

Vygotsky L S. Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.

Bruner J S. The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674028999

Grassini S. Shaping the future of education: Exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Education Sciences, 2023, 13 (7): 692. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692

Abunaseer H. The use of generative AI in education: Applications, and impact. Technology and the Curriculum: Summer 2023, 2023.

Downloads

Published

28-09-2024

How to Cite

Si, P. (2024). The Influencing Factors of High School English Teachers Choosing Different Teaching Media. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 38, 137-142. https://doi.org/10.54097/j1z7da32