Factors Influencing High-Performing Education Systems: A Case Study of Singapore

Authors

  • Qiuyi Chen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/06knzs92

Keywords:

high-performing education system, Singapore, education reform, quality of teacher education, impact of school leadership, cultural context.

Abstract

Singapore’s remarkable performance in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) has placed it among the world’s high-performing education systems (HPES). Taking Singapore as an example, this article analyzes the factors that affect the high-performing education system. These factors include education reform, the quality of teacher education, school leadership, and cultural context. Firstly, the influence of the basic education curriculum reform on the high-efficiency education system in Singapore is mainly reflected in three areas, which are training objectives, school system, and curriculum setting. Secondly, quality of teacher education includes the following aspects, namely rigorous selection and training, continuous professional development, teacher performance evaluation, and career development paths. Thirdly, the strategic investment in school leadership programs has built a robust capacity for effective educational change and improvement. Fourthly, the cultural context of Singapore, with its test-oriented and centralized educational framework, reinforces a meritocratic ideology that supports standardized national curriculum and high-stakes exams, which have been instrumental in driving the system’s high performance. Based on the above factors, this paper also puts forward some measures, taking educational diversion, setting up a special principal training program, and creating a high-quality teacher development road, that other countries can learn from to promote the development of their education systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Aho, E., Pitkanen, K., & Sahlberg, P. (2006). Policy development and reform principles of basic and secondary education in Finland since 1968. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978 - 0 - 8213 - 6719 - 0.

[2] Balfour, R., & Cartwright, M. (2008). Education systems: Singapore’s schooling success. International Journal of Education Management, 22 (5), 391 - 403. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540810886555.

[3] Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top. London: McKinsey & Company. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/dotcom/Reports/Sustainability/World%20Schools%20Report/Worlds%20best%20performing%20school%20systems%20full%20report.ashx.

[4] Bray, M., Adamson, B., & Mason, M. (Eds.). (2014). Comparative education research: Approaches and methods (Vol. 19). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978 - 94 - 017 - 8006 - 3.

[5] Bulle, N. (2011). Comparing OECD educational models through the prism of PISA. Comparative Education, 47 (4), 503 – 521. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2011.555117.

[6] Deng, Z., & Gopinathan, S. (2016). PISA and high-performing education systems: Explaining Singapore’s education success. Comparative Education, 52 (4), 449 - 472. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2016.1262587.

[7] Gopinathan, S. (2007). Globalization and the Education Quotient (EQ) of Singapore. In P. G. Altbach & J. P. Tan (Eds.), The quest for world-class universities: Challenges for developing countries (pp. 131 - 148). Edward Elgar.

[8] Harris, A., Jones, M. S., Adams, D., Perera, C. J., & Sharma, S. (2014). High-performing education systems in Asia: Leadership art meets implementation science. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23 (4), 861 – 869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299 - 014 - 0209 - y.

[9] Jerrim, J. (2014). Why do East Asian children perform so well in PISA? An investigation of Western-born children of East Asian descent. Institute of Education, University of London.

[10] Kwok, H. (2013). Education reform in Singapore: An analysis of policy imperatives and challenges. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 21 (42). https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1507.

[11] Lee, J., & Gopinathan, S. (2010). The teaching profession and the state in Singapore. In A. Liem & A. Martino (Eds.), The international handbook of men’s schools (pp. 153 - 164). Routledge.

[12] Ng, P. T. (2008). Moving TSLN forward: Innovation and enterprise. In J. Tan & P. T. Ng (Eds.), Thinking schools, learning nation: Contemporary issues and challenges (pp. 51 – 60). Singapore: Prentice Hall.

[13] OECD. (2010a). Strong performers and successful performers in education: Lessons from PISA for the United States. Paris: OECD Publishing.

[14] OECD. (2010b). Singapore: Rapid improvement followed by strong performance. Paris: OECD.

[15] Pi, J. H. (2002). The educational tracking system in Singapore and its implications for educational reform in China. Baidu Scholar.

[16] Simola, H. (2005). The Finnish miracle of PISA: Historical and sociological remarks on teaching and teacher education. Comparative Education, 41 (4), 455 – 470. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060500317810.

[17] Simola, H., & Rinne, R. (2011). Education politics and contingency. In M. A. Pereyra, H.-G. Kotthoff, & R. Cowen (Eds.), Pisa under examination: Changing knowledge, changing tests, and changing schools (pp. 225 – 244). Rotterdam: Sense.

[18] Tatto, M. T., Schwille, J., Senk, S. L., & Ingvarson, L. (2018). Policy, practice, and readiness to teach: Stories from the field. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. https://www.iea.nl/publications/policy_practice_readiness_teach.

[19] United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education: All means all.

[20] OECD. (2023). “Executive Summary”, in PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education, OECD Publishing, Paris.

[21] Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193.

Downloads

Published

25-12-2024

How to Cite

Chen, Q. (2024). Factors Influencing High-Performing Education Systems: A Case Study of Singapore. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 43, 201-209. https://doi.org/10.54097/06knzs92