Experimental Curriculum Reform of Applied Chemistry in Petroleum Colleges and Universities

-- An example of surfactant evaluation for drainage and gas recovery

Authors

  • Shijun Chen
  • Sanbao Dong
  • Gang Chen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v7i.4755

Keywords:

Comprehensive experiment; Foam drainage agent; Foaming ability; Foaming stability.

Abstract

In order to further improve the comprehensive experimental skills of undergraduates, understand the performance of different surfactants, and understand the working principles and evaluation methods of drainage gas recovery more effectively, a comprehensive experiment of foam draining agents were designed using four different kinds of surfactants. The surface tension, foaming ability and stability were evaluated. The students can further comprehend the investigative background and applicative field of the foam drainage agent as well as deepen the understanding of mechanization of foaming ability and stability through the design of this experiment. This experiment combines chemicals theory and experimental technology, which can improve students’ professional test skills, skills of analysis and problem-solving.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hu Shiqiang, Liu Jianyi, Li Yan, et al. Study on the Foaming Performance of A New High-efficiency Foam Agent LH [J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2017, 27(1): 102-104.

Li Qianding, Lu Yongbin, Li Shanjian, et al. Development and Performance Evaluation of A New High-efficiency Foam Agent LYB-1 [J]. Development Engineering, 2011, 31(6): 49-52.

Mei Minghua, Tian Xijun, & Liu Shuzhe. Study on the Optimization of Drainage Gas Recovery Process for Gas Well Liquid Loading [J]. Petrochemical Industry Application, 2012, 31(8): 97-99.

Deng Qiang, Yan Jiao, Bai Yun, et al. Study on the Kinetic Equation of Surfactant Foaming and the Effect of Temperature on It [J]. Sino-Global Energy, 2017, 22(7): 46-51.

Deng Qiang, Bai Yun, Dong Ke, et al. Study on the Kinetics of Surfactant Foam Elimination [J]. Advances in Fine Petrochemicals, 2017, 18(5): 15-17.

Song Qihuang. Fine Chemical Technology [M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2004: 64.

Luo Xiquan. Recent Status and Outlook of Anionic Surfactant Production in China [J]. Detergent & Cosmetics, 2011, 34(2): 1-8.

Deng Qiang, Ning Yang, Wang Xiaoling, et al. Research Method for the Foaming Process of Anionic Foam Agent [J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas, 2017, 46(2): 75-79.

Zhou Xiaoquan, & Fan Bo. Discussion on the Relationship between Oilfield Chemicals and Surfactants [J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas, 2002, 31(1): 37-42.

Wu Huaping, Sun Yongqiang, & Kang Baoan. Relationship between Structure and Properties of Nonionic Surfactant [J]. Detergent & Cosmetics, 2012, 35(6): 17-21.

Yan Qunfang. Properties and Applications of Nonionic Surfactant [J]. Guizhou Chemical Industry, 2005, 30(5): 4-9.

Liu He. Discussion on the Characteristics and Applications of Nonionic Surfactant [J]. Leather and Chemicals, 2012, 29(2): 20-27.

Xiao Anmin. Amphoteric Surfactant and Its Synthesis [J]. China Cleaning Industry, 2001(1):30-34.

Chen Yuping, Ding Wei, & Yu Tao. Molecular Dynamics Simulation of the Interfacial Behavior of a New Betaine Type Amphoteric Surfactant [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica (Petroleum Processing Section), 2012, 28(4): 591-597.

Lai Chongwei. Study on New Anti-oil and Anti-salt Foam Agent System [D]. Sichuan: Sichuan University, 2007.

Chen Gang, Zhang Jianjia, Zhang Jie, et al. A Comprehensive Experiment on the Application of Waste to Prepare Green Oilfield Chemicals [J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Education, 2015, 36(8): 58-60.

Downloads

Published

13-01-2023

How to Cite

Chen, S., Dong, S., & Chen, G. (2023). Experimental Curriculum Reform of Applied Chemistry in Petroleum Colleges and Universities: -- An example of surfactant evaluation for drainage and gas recovery. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 7, 350-357. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v7i.4755