Analyzing the Narrative Framing Pitfalls of Social Media Based on Propaganda Model

Authors

  • Yufeng Ni

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v13i.7869

Keywords:

Social media; propaganda model; strategic narrative; the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

Abstract

Social media is a product of the web 2.0 era. It has always been regarded as a symbol of the spirit of "freedom" and "sharing" in this period. Early media optimists believed that social media would free democracy from the encroachment of mass media and expand the sphere of public opinion. With the development of digital technology and social media, the information content produced by the public on social media has the same dissemination ability as mass media to a certain extent. From a neoliberal perspective, such changes herald the overall rise of press freedom and freedom of opinion on social media. However, it remains to be seen whether social media can break through the social framework constructed by the mass media to achieve freedom of expression. Therefore, this paper explores this issue based on the classical theoretical frame in the political economy of the media-the Propaganda Model (PM). By selecting the "Bucha massacre" in the Russia-Ukraine conflict as the research object, and collecting and conducting qualitative research on the data of social media platforms, the results of this paper guide to an answer: with strong control from the mass media and social elites, it is difficult for social media to fulfill the expected breakthrough task it was entrusted with. The more serious situation is that contemporary social media has a great possibility of becoming a link in the propaganda framework.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aichner, T., Grünfelder, M., Maurer, O., & Jegeni, D. Twenty-five years of social media: a review of social media applications and definitions from 1994 to 2019. Cyberpsychology, behavior, and social networking, 2021, 24(4), 215-222.

Ellison, N. B., Boyd, D., & Dutton, W. H. The Oxford handbook of Internet studies, 2013.

Carr, C. T., & Hayes, R. A. Social media: Defining, developing, and divining. Atlantic journal of communication, 2015, 23(1), 46-65.

Brannon, V. C. Free speech and the regulation of social media content. Congressional Research Service, 2019, 27.

Freedman L. Networks, culture and narratives. Adelphi Papers, 2006, 45(379): 11-26.

Todorov T, Weinstein A. Structural analysis of narrative//NOVEL: A forum on fiction. Duke university press, 1969, 3(1): 70-76.

Burke K. A rhetoric of motives. Univ of California Press, 1969.

Miskimmon, A., O'loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. Strategic narratives: Communication power and the new world order. Routledge, 2014.

Herman, E.S. & Chomsky, N. Manufacturing consent: the political economy of the mass media. New York: Pantheon Books, 1988.

Herman E S, Chomsky N, Chomsky N. Manufacturing consent. 2002.

Ringsmose, J., & Børgesen, B. K. Shaping public attitudes towards the deployment of military power: NATO, Afghanistan and the use of strategic narratives. European security, 2011, 20(4), 505-528.

Daniel Berehulak & Carlotta Gall."Bucha killings: Satellite image of bodies’ site contradicts Russian claims". BBC News, 11 April 2022.

NEWS WIRES. "EU adopts fresh sanctions against Russia including coal import ban". France24, 8 April 2022.

Hui Wang. "Former U.S. Marine Corps official: I questioned Biden's version of the "Bucha" incident and was blocked by Twitter". Observer Net, 07 April 2022.

Mullen, & Klaehn, J. The Herman-Chomsky Propaganda Model: A Critical Approach to Analysing Mass Media Behaviour. Sociology Compass, 2010, 4(4), 215–229.

Downloads

Published

11-05-2023

How to Cite

Ni, Y. (2023). Analyzing the Narrative Framing Pitfalls of Social Media Based on Propaganda Model. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 13, 118-123. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v13i.7869