The International Application and Development Prospect of the Principle Purpose Test Clause

Authors

  • Tongzhou Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v16i.10597

Keywords:

Principle purpose test; Abuse of tax treaties; MLI.

Abstract

Abuse of tax treaties by taxpayers through various means has become increasingly rampant, infringing on the tax base of each country. The OECD has formulated the PPT rule in order to protect global tax order. The main content of the rule is: a tax benefit shall not be granted if obtaining that benefit was one of the principal purposes of any arrangement or transaction that resulted directly or indirectly in that benefit. The PPT rule is favored by countries for its simplicity, and it gradually developed into one of the most important rules in the anti-abuse system. However, there are many problems in the current application of the rule. This paper begins with a description of the concept of the PPT rule and three points of contention, followed by an analysis of the application of the PPT rule in the domestic laws of four countries and the problems that exist globally. Finally, this paper puts forward three recommendations that are relevant to the future development of the PPT rule.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cantos José M. BEPS project and international tax reform: The 2021 agreements on taxing multinational companies. Evaluation Review, 2022,46(6).

OECD. Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent BEPS. https://www.oecd.org/tax/treaties/multilateral-convention-to-implement-tax-treaty-related-measures-to-prevent-beps.html, last accessed 2023/5/3.

Wu Siling. Study on the application of the principal purpose test in international tax conventions. East China University of Political Science and Law, 2019.

Jonathan Kim. The U.S.-West German Income Tax Treaty: Can Article 28's Limitation on Benefits Serve as a Model for the Treasury's Anti-Treaty Shopping Policy? The Tax Lawyer, 1990,43(4): 983-1006.

David Kleist. The Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent BEPS: Some Thoughts on Complexity and Uncertainty. Nordic Tax Journal, 2018,1: 31-48.

Zhang lei. A study on the limitation on benefits provisions in tax treaties of the united states. Southwest University of Political Science and Law.

Lu Xiaochi. Research on the principal purpose test clauses to prevent the abuse of tax treaties. Liaoning University, 2022.

Shi rujing. Study on the application of principal purpose test rules in international tax: Taking Australia as a comparative perspective. Shanghai Jiao Tong University.

Johann Hattingh. Taxation of Bilateral Investments: Tax Treaties after BEPS, Carlo Garbarino. South African Law Journal, 2020, 137(3): 565-575.

Yu Qiuyan. Study on the burden of proof during the application of the principal purpose test. East China University of Political Science and Law

Li Na. Challenges of the MLI: How to Conduct the Principal Purpose Test. East China University of Political Science and Law, 2019.

Ni Jinping. Research on anti abuse of tax treaties: From the perspective of main purpose test. Jillin University of finance and economics, 2022.

Richard L. Reinhold. What is tax treaty abuse? (is treaty shopping an outdated concept?). The Tax Lawyer, 2000(3).

Downloads

Published

02-08-2023

How to Cite

Zhang, T. (2023). The International Application and Development Prospect of the Principle Purpose Test Clause. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 16, 355-362. https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v16i.10597