Equity Incentives and Firm Innovation Efficiency: Moderating Role of Ownership Concentration

Authors

  • Luyao Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v17i.11075

Keywords:

Ownership Concentration, Equity Incentives, Innovation Efficiency.

Abstract

In order to cope with the new situation and new challenges facing China's economic development, the country proposes to accelerate industrial transformation and upgrading with innovation drive, and lead scientific and technological development with scientific and technological innovation. Manufacturing industry occupies an important share in the national economy, and how to improve the overall competitiveness of China's manufacturing industry and the innovation efficiency of enterprises has become a hot issue of general concern for all sectors of society. Based on innovation theory, principal-agent theory and two-factor incentive theory, this paper systematically investigates executive equity incentives, ownership concentration and innovation efficiency for China's manufacturing industry, and also tests the ownership concentration regulation effect in groups under the perspective of equity optimization. It is found that: (1) Executive equity incentives are significantly and positively related to innovation efficiency. (2) Ownership concentration is significantly and positively related to innovation efficiency. (3) The more significant the promotion effect of executive shareholding on innovation efficiency when the equity is relatively concentrated. This paper can provide a reference for Chinese manufacturing industry to establish a sound incentive mechanism and optimize equity policy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bettis C, Bizjak J, Coles J, et al. Stock and option grants with performance-based vesting provisions. The Review of Financial Studies, 2010, 23(10): 3849-3888.

Lin C, Lin P and Song F M. Managerial incentives, CEO characteristics and corporate innovation in China’s private sector. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2011, 39(2): 176-190.

Cosh A, Fu X, Hughes A. Organisation structure and innovation performance in different environments. Small Business Economics, 2012, 39(2): 301-317.

Tien C, Chen C N. Myth or reality? Assessing the moderating role of CEO compensation on the momentum of innovation in R&D. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2012, 23(13): 2763-2784.

Panousi V, Papanikolaou D. Investment, idiosyncratic risk, and ownership. The Journal of finance, 2012, 67(3): 1113-1148.

Xu X L, Chen H H, Li Y, et al. The role of equity balance and executive stock ownership in the innovation efficiency of renewable energy enterprises. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 2019, 11(5): 055901.

Wang Cheng, Hao Haiyu. Management incentives, equity Structure and innovation performance - empirical evidence based on private listed companies in China. Friends of Accounting, 2016(15): 40-43, 44.)

Mu Linjuan, Song Weiwei. The impact of executive incentives on corporate innovation investment in asset-light firms. Friends of Accounting, 2019(23): 16-21.

Lu Guoqing. Equity incentives and corporate technological innovation - empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies. Xuehai, 2019(6): 114-119.

Wang Yan. Executive equity incentives and corporate innovation. Finance and accounting study, 2019(5): 191-192.

Zhou Simeng. Analysis of employee equity incentives to promote innovation performance of high-tech enterprises. Modern Business Industry, 2020, 41(30): 71-72.

Dong Ping, Zhou Xiaochun. Employee equity incentives and corporate technological innovation - evidence from listed companies in China's manufacturing industry. Journal of Guangdong Institute of Petrochemical Technology, 2020, 30(4): 77-83.

Chao Shenglin, Yin Zongcheng. Management competence, innovation investment and corporate innovation performance - based on the moderating effects of equity incentives and executive human capital. Journal of Hunan University of Technology, 2020, 34(3): 69-75.

Deng Jiusheng, Luo Yiwen. The impact of executive incentives and government intervention on innovation efficiency - an empirical analysis based on China's GEM listed companies. Business Accounting, 2020(15): 35-40.

Yang Huihui, Pan Fei, Hu Wenfang. The impact of equity incentives on the scientific and technological innovation capacity of enterprises. Research Management, 2020, 41(6): 181-190.

Huang Xinjian, You Shanshan. Equity incentive contract, technological innovation and innovation efficiency. Research Management, 2020, 41(3): 217-226.

Ma Lili, Liao Jingwen, Chen Rongxiu. The effects of technical directors and equity incentives on corporate innovation efficiency. Science and Technology Progress and Countermeasures, 2020, 37(21): 82-90.

Zhu Desheng, Zhou Xiaopei. Equity checks and balances, executive shareholding and corporate innovation efficiency. Nankai Management Review, 2016, 19(03): 136-144.

Zhu Desheng, Li Shaochen. The impact of equity incentives on firms' innovative activities: promotion or inhibition? Journal of Shandong University of Finance and Economics, 2020, 32(1): 109-120.

Cheng Cuifeng. Executive incentives, ownership concentration and corporate R&D and innovation strategies - empirical evidence based on the moderating effect of panel data of listed manufacturing companies. East China Economic Management, 2018, 32(11): 118-125.

Wang Li, Xi Fangfang, Zhuang Yumei. Can the implementation of equity incentives promote corporate innovation? - An empirical test based on high-tech enterprises. Business Accounting, 2019(14): 15-19.

Shao Jianbing, Wu Shan. Equity incentives and dual innovation in high-tech enterprises. Research and Development Management, 2020, 32(4): 176-186.

Hosono K, Tomiyama M, Miyagawa T. Corporate governance and research and development: evidence from Japan. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2004, 13(2): 141-164.

Garcia Meca, Nchez Ballesta J P. Corporate governance and earning management: A meta-analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2009, 17(5): 594-610.

Di Vito J, Laurin C, Bozec Y. R&D activity in Canada: Does corporate ownership structure matter? Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 2010, 27(2): 107-121.

Deng Z, Hofman P and Newman A. Ownership concentration and product innovation in Chinese private SMEs. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2013, 30(3): 717-734.

Chen V, Li J, Shapiro D and Zhang X. Ownership structure and innovation: An emerging market perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2014, 31(1): 1-24.

Minetti R, Murro P, and Paiella M. Ownership structure, governance, and innovation. European Economic Review, 2015(80): 165-193.

Jiang Weihua. Equity structure, working capital and corporate innovation - the case of listed high-tech enterprises in China. Friends of Accounting, 2017(23): 13-19.

Yang Yahan. Research on technological innovation of enterprises under different equity intensity. China Economy and Trade, 2018(24): 123-124.

Zheng Yi, Wang Linlin, Wang Minghua, Ying Liying. Correlation test between equity structure and R&D investment - Empirical evidence from GEM market. Science and Technology Management Research, 2016, 36(24): 69-76.

Zhang Yujuan, Zhang Xuehui, Chang Qing et al. Mechanism and empirical research on the influence of equity structure and executive incentives on corporate innovation - empirical evidence based on A-share listed companies. Science Management Research, 2018, 36(22): 67-70, 75.

Zhang Yujuan, Tang Xiangxi. Equity structure, executive incentives and corporate innovation - based on data from A-share listed companies with different ownership properties. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, 2018, 40(9): 76-93.

Zhang Bo. Government subsidies, ownership concentration and R&D investment. Accounting Newsletter, 2020, (08): 46-50.

Yang Le, Yu Juanjuan. Ownership concentration, corporate social responsibility and technological innovation: an empirical study based on listed companies in GEM. Innovation and Technology, 2020, 20(04): 48-57.

Ning Qingqing, Chen Jinyong, Yuan Menghan. Property rights nature, controlling shareholders and corporate autonomous innovation. Journal of Chongqing University (Social Science Edition), 2018, 24(04): 96-107.

Maury B and Pajuste A. Multiple large shareholders and firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2005, 29(7): 1813-1834.

Zulfiqar M, Hussain K. CEO compensation and firm innovation: moderating role of ownership concentration. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2020, 24(06): 2050058.

Guo Yong. The impact of equity incentives on corporate innovation efficiency. Friends of Accounting, 2020(12): 119-125.

Li Quan, Yang Kun. The impact of executive incentives on corporate innovation - an empirical analysis based on 41 listed financial institutions from 2013-2018. Journal of Shihezi University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2020(2): 61-68.

Luo Fuyan, Shen Zhonghua. Equity incentives, agency costs and corporate investment efficiency. Research on Finance and Trade, 2013, 24(02): 146-156.

Jensen M. and Meckling W. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, 3(4): 305-360.

Zhao Xi, Lin Delin, Hao Ting. A study on the impact of financial resource redundancy on R&D investment: the moderating effect of equity incentives. 2017, 36(3): 36-41.

Ceccagnoli M. Appropriability, preemption, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 2009, 30(1): 81-98.

Huffman R C, Hegarty W H. Top management influence on innovations: Effects of executive characteristics and social culture. Journal of management, 1993, 19(3): 549-574.

Zhang Changzheng, Lv Yuefan. An empirical study on the relationship between managerial autonomy and corporate R&D investment - the moderating effect of ownership concentration. Soft Science, 2017(9): 110-114.

Li Ping, Liu Lili. Government R&D funding, corporate R&D investment and innovation efficiency in China. Research Management, 2017, 38(1): 21-29.

Downloads

Published

31-08-2023

How to Cite

Wang, L. (2023). Equity Incentives and Firm Innovation Efficiency: Moderating Role of Ownership Concentration. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 17, 124-138. https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v17i.11075