The competitiveness analysis of Chinese automobile industry based on Improved Porter Diamond Model

Authors

  • Nantao Wei

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v17i.11253

Keywords:

Improved Porter Diamond Model, Automobile Industry, Core competitiveness, Entropy method, TOPSIS.

Abstract

With the rapid development of Chinese automobile industry, it has become one of the pillar industries of the national economy, which plays an increasingly important role in the rapid growth of the national economy. This paper aims to investigate the competitiveness of Chinese automobile industry in different provinces and cities and to quantify the core competitiveness. Improved Porter Diamond Model is adopted to evaluate the factors that affect the Chinese automobile industry, including Industrial structure, Production factors, Demand conditions, Related and supporting industries. The data used for the analysis mainly comes from China Automobile Yearbook. Entropy Method and TOPSIS are applied to calculate the weights of each factor and evaluate the quality level of the indexes. According to the analysis, Guangdong, Jiangsu, Shanghai, Jilin, Shandong, Hubei, Zhejiang, and Beijing have higher scores and top ranking, showing strong core competitiveness, which is consistent with the reality. Tibet, Qinghai, and Ningxia ranked last because of their geographical location, which restricted the development of their automobile industry. The model can truly rank the province’s automobile core competitiveness quantitatively, which is consistent with the reality and has high practical application value. Overall, these results shed light on guiding further exploration of the evaluation and quantification of core competitiveness in different industries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Porter “Cluster and the new economics of competition,” Harvard Business Review, vol.76(6), 1998, pp.77-90.

L. Feng, “A Study on Cluster Development of Automobile Industry in Chongqing-Based on Diamond Model,” Science and Technology Management Research, vol.31(4), 2011, pp.169-172.

G. Erboz, “A Qualitative Study on Industry 4.0 Competitiveness in Turkey Using Porter Diamond Model,” Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, vol.13(2), 2020, pp.266-282.

Y. Wang, L. Li, “Analysis of Competitiveness of High-Tech Industry in Nanjing Based on Porter Diamond Model,” International Conference on Materials, Control, Automation and Electrical Engineering,2020.

V. Tsiligiris, “An adapted Porter Diamond Model for the evaluation of transnational education host countries,” International Journal of Education Management, vol.32(2), 2018, pp.210-226.

A. Chobanyan, L. Leigh, “The competitive advantages of nations: Applying the “Diamond” model to Armenia,” International Journal of Emerging Markets, vol.1(2), 2006, pp.147-164.

W. Jarungkikul, S. Sukcharoensin, “Benchmarking the competitiveness of the ASEAN 5 equity markets: An application of Porter’s diamond model,” Benchmarking: An international Journal,vol.23(5), 2016, pp. 1312-1340.

S. C. Gonzáles, J. C. Peña. Vinces, J. Guillen, “The competitiveness of Latin American economies: Consolidation of the double diamond model,” Economic Systems, vol.40(3), 2016, pp.373-386.

X. Chen, K. Yang, Z. Pan, et al, “Current situation and Development Countermeasures of Chinese new energy automobile industry,” CO-Operative Economy & Science,vol. 22, 2021, pp.20-22.

China Association of Automobile Manufactures. China Automotive Industry Yearbook, Tianjin: China Automotive Industry Yearbook house, 2021.

Z. Zou, Y. Yun, J. Sun “Entropy method for determination of. weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment,” Journal of environmental sciences, vol.18(5), 2006, pp.1020-1023.

M. R. Hassanzadeh, C. Valmohammadi, “Evaluation and ranking of. the banks and financial institutes using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS techniques,” International Journal of Operational Research, vol.40(3), 2021, pp.297-317.

Downloads

Published

31-08-2023