Enhancing Option Pricing Accuracy through Empirical Performance: A GARCH-Based Approach to Refining Volatility Assumptions in the Black-Scholes Model

Authors

  • Tianyu Tong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/r0j2mn71

Keywords:

Monte Carlo simulation, BS Model, GARCH model, autocorrelation.

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive investigation into enhancing the precision of option pricing by refining the volatility assumption of the Black-Scholes (BS) model through the incorporation of the GARCH model. This study uses a methodical approach that includes rigors comparative analysis, Monte Carlo simulations, and historical data calibration. The findings indicate that, when the GARCH model is combined with the conventional BS model using implied volatility, the RMSE is reduced by about 3.3%. The slight autocorrelation in the sample data's inherent constraints, however, mitigate this improvement. This study emphasizes the significance of model assumption revision for capturing changing market dynamics, making a significant contribution to the conversation on improving option pricing accuracy. This study also acts as a crucial resource for academics and industry professionals navigating the complexity of option pricing and volatility modelling.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Black, F., & Scholes, M. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 1973, 81 (3): 637 – 654.

Merton, R. C. Theory of rational option pricing. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 1973, 4 (1): 141.

Black, F. Studies of stock price volatility changes. In Proceedings of the 1976 Meetings of the American Statistical Association, 1976, pp: 171 - 181.

Lahouel, N., & Hellara, S. Improving the option pricing performance of GARCH models in inefficient market. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 2020, 17 (2): 14 – 25.

Mandelbrot, B. The variation of certain speculative prices. The Journal of Business, 1963), 36 (4): 394.

Engle, R. F. Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica, 1982, 50 (4): 987.

Bollerslev, T. Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 1986, 31 (3), 307 – 327.

Bollerslev, T. The story of Garch: A personal odyssey. Journal of Econometrics, 2023, 234: 96 – 100.

Andersen, T. G., & Bollerslev, T. Volatility. Edward Elgar Pub., Inc, 2018

Dritsakis, N., & Savvas, G. Forecasting volatility stock return: Evidence from the Nordic Stock Exchanges. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2017, 9 (2): 15.

Hansen, P. R., & Lunde, A. A forecast comparison of volatility models: Does anything beat a GARCH (1, 1)? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2005, 20 (7): 873 – 889.

Downloads

Published

27-12-2023