How Elite Groups Entrench Their Dominance Through Law and Economics?

Authors

  • Zixi Zhou
  • Ruixi Zhu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/gbwcm263

Keywords:

Royal supremacy, religious disadvantage, Capitalism dominance, Legal control, Tax regulations, Economic limitations.

Abstract

By studying the two periods in British history influenced by the Enlightenment movement, we can gain a deeper understanding of how elite groups solidify their dominance across various social contexts. Understanding the historical mechanisms of this entrenchment enables us to mitigate similar mistakes and risks in the future. We have analyzed some essays that explore how elite groups maintained their dominance during these two periods. Our findings reveal that in the 16th century, the monarch, who represented the elite at the time, used religion to consolidate their power. They achieved this by merging political and religious authorities, which subsequently led to the potential for abuses of power. We believe that such risks can be mitigated while still preserving the influence of the monarchy, by separating church and state but allowing the monarch to exert influence through a council. Under the capitalist society of the 19th century, research proved that elite groups consolidated their absolute power through legal regulations, economic limitations, and tax rates. The connection between and details within the case study is shown, along with further analysis of relating documents and societal issues worth discussing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Liu Cheng, Monarch supremacy and fall of the papacy in 16 centuries British, China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House, 2023.

Dominiak, P. “All things are lawful”: Adiaphora, permissive natural law, Christian Freedom, and defending the English Reformation. Perichoresis, 2022.

Doepke, M., & Zilibotti, F. Occupational Choice and the Spirit of Capitalism, 2007.

Richard, J. W. The vicissitudes of the doctrine of the lord’s Supper in the English church: A study in dogmatic history: Papers of the American Society of Church history. Cambridge Core, 2009.

Stapleton, J, 1913 – 1916: Two competing visions of the Church of England. Herbert Hensley Henson, J. N. Figgis and the Archbishops’ Committee on Church and State, 2022.

Linda Woodhead, Secular privilege, religious disadvantage. The British Journal of Sociology, 2008, 59 (1).

H., Ward Duren J. The Classification of Religions: Different Methods, Their Advantages and Disadvantages. University of California Libraries, 2014.

Khosravinik, M. Right wing populism in the west: Social media discourse and echo chambers. Insight Turkey, 2017, 19 (3): 53 – 68.

Passant, J. Tax and the forgotten classes: From the Magna Carta to the English Revolution. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 2016, 10 (3).

Wilterdink, Nico. The Dynamics of Inequality and Habitus Formation. Elias, Bourdieu, and the Rise of Nationalist Populism. GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, 2017.

Downloads

Published

27-12-2023

How to Cite

Zhou, Z., & Zhu, R. (2023). How Elite Groups Entrench Their Dominance Through Law and Economics?. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 22, 261-267. https://doi.org/10.54097/gbwcm263