Abnormal Returns: Takeover Prediction Modelling - Shanghai Stock Exchange

Authors

  • Ningdan Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v21i.14968

Keywords:

Merge and Acquisition (M&A), Prediction Model, Abnormal Returns.

Abstract

Around the Merge and Acquisition (M&A) announcement date, the targets will experience dramatic increases in their share price. The movement of share pricesbrings investment opportunities. To successfully predict the future targets and make an investment strategy, investors can obtain the abnormal return from the increment of the share price. However, many articles of research show that even successfully predicted large numbers of targets, within the investment portfolio, are still unable to show the abnormal return. To make a successful investment strategy, researchers summarized the potential negative factors of the portfolios' return. For example, the investment timing, the distressed firms which share the common characteristics with predicted targets. This paper motivated by the potential improvement space for target portfolio's return, attempts to rationalised a successful investment portfolio. Through selecting the determinate characteristics of targets, building a prediction model, studying its abnormal return and analysing the influence of a distressed firm on the abnormal return, this paper determines that the targets can be distinguished from non-targets with the characteristics of inefficient management, misevaluation, high sales growth, low liquidity and larger free cash flow; consistent with determinant characters, the prediction model has a good predictability; however, good predictability could not produce the abnormal return; furthermore, even the empirical result shows that the target portfolio actually involves a certain percentage of the distressed firms which have significant differences from no-distressed firms, the portfolio can still not obtain abnormal return by screening the distressed firms using its characteristics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Danbolt, J., Siganos, A., & Tunyi, A. (2016). Abnormal Returns from Takeover Prediction Modelling: Challenges and Suggested Investment Strategies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 43(1-2), 66-97. doi:10.1111/jbfa.12179

Dietrich, J., & Sorensen, E. (1984). An application of logit analysis to prediction of merger targets. Journal of Business Research, 12(3), 393-402. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(84)90020-1

Palepu, K. G. (1986). Predicting takeover targets. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 8(1), 3-35. doi:10.1016/0165-4101(86)90008-x

Powell, R. G. (1997), ‘Modelling Takeover Likelihood’, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 24, Nos. 7–8, pp. 1009–30.

Li, S., & Zeng, Z. (2003). Characteristics of takeover targets in China equity market. Economic Research Journal, (11), 54-64.

Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S. W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin's q. Financial management, 70-74.

DeGhett, V. (2014). Effective use of Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient: an additional point. Animal Behaviour, 98, e1-e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.10.006

O’brien, R. M. (2007). A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673-690. doi:10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6

Powell, R. G. and A. Yawson (2007), ‘Are Corporate Restructuring Events Driven by Common Factors? Implications for Takeover Prediction’, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 34, Nos.7–8, pp. 1169–92.

Geng, R., Bose, I., & Chen, X. (2015). Prediction of financial distress: An empirical study of listed Chinese companies using data mining. European Journal of Operational Research, 241(1), 236-247. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.08.016

Brar, G., Giamouridis, D., & Liodakis, M. (2009). Predicting European Takeover Targets. European Financial Management, 15(2), 430-450. doi:10.1111/j.1468- 036x.2007. 00423.x

Downloads

Published

12-12-2023

How to Cite

Zhang, N. (2023). Abnormal Returns: Takeover Prediction Modelling - Shanghai Stock Exchange. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 21, 1081-1090. https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v21i.14968