Multi-factor Stock Forecasting Based on Regression and Machine Learning Models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/gvw66p91Keywords:
Machine learning; time series forecasting; multi-factorAbstract
In some stock predictions, shallow learning is better than deep learning. With this in mind, this study will adopt a machine learning model and a regression model to predict Chinese stocks to help the stock timing strategy. Different from the previous usage of plenty of indicators as stock features for prediction, this study selected specified multi-factor data and compared the prediction effects of foreign multi-factor data models and China's multi-factor data models to verify. It is found that the prediction effect of the Chinese new salience multi-factor data model which has a better ability to explain market anomalies is better. However, factor models with higher correlations have poor results. Compared with randomly selecting factors or selected factors weight by model, choosing a specific factor model in advance can not only improve calculation efficiency, but also improve prediction accuracy. In addition, compared with the regression model, the prediction results of machine learning also have better performance results.
Downloads
References
Huang N, Yu M. Research progress on the impact of machine learning on economics research. Economic Perspectives, 2018, (7):115-129.
Lee C M C. Technological links and predictable returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 2019,132(3): 76-96.
Harvey C R, Liu Y, Zhu H et al. The cross-section of expected returns. The Review of Financial Studies, 2016, 29(1): 5-68.
Hou K, Chen X, Lu Z. Digesting anomalies: An investment approach. The Review of Financial Studies, 2015, 28(3): 650-705.
Sun K, Zhu Y. Salience Theory Based Factors in China. SSRN 4342607, 2023.
Fama E F, Kenneth R F. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of financial economics, 1993, 33(1):3-56.
Carhart M M. On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of finance, 1997, 52(1): 57-82.
Liu J, Robert F S, Yu Y. Size and value in China. Journal of Financial Economics, 2019, 134(1): 48-69.
Sharpe W F. Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The journal of finance, 1964,19(3): 425-442.
Lintner J. Security prices, risk, and maximal gains from diversification. The journal of finance, 1965, 20(4): 587-615.
Black F, Michael C J, Myron S. The capital asset pricing model: Some empirical tests, 1972.
Chai T F, Roland R. Draxler. Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)?–Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature. Geoscientific model development, 2014,7(3): 1247-1250.
Chung J Y. Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.3555, 2014.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






