A Comparative Study on Jorion’s Estimator in Contemporary Market

Authors

  • Xinzhu Leng

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/z3t7wh89

Keywords:

Markowitz Mean-Variance Model, Optimal Portfolio Weights, Shrinkage Estimator.

Abstract

In knowledge of the prominence of Markowitz model in modern portfolio theory, and the following controversy on the appropriate choices of input parameters, this study examines the practical performance of Jorion's estimator as one of the estimation strategies to reduce the estimation error inherent in traditional input parameter. A comprehensive dataset of real stock market returns, encompassing 7 assets and 2 industries, is employed. Jorion's estimator entails the adjustment of the mean of sample return towards the mean of minimum variance portfolio. The results are then integrated into the optimization phase of Markowitz model. To evaluate the effectiveness of Jorion’s estimator, realized returns and return volatility of Markowitz model adapted by Jorion’s estimator are compared against the traditional model. The findings provide insights into the practicability of Jorion's estimator for portfolio management in contemporary capital market. After comparisons, all 3 measures of realized returns from Jorion’s estimator outperforms the counterpart from traditional parameter. This study affirms that the classic sample mean is inadequate as an estimator for future performance, and sophisticated techniques, such as Jorion’s estimator should be employed in real-world investment strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Z. Bodie, A. Kane, and A. J. Marcus, “Capital Allocation to Risky Assets,” Investments, 12th, New York, US: McGraw-Hill Education, 167-200 (2021).

E. Vercher, J. D. Bermúdez, and J. V. Segura, “Fuzzy portfolio optimization under Downside Risk Measures,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 158, 769–782 (2006).

W. Bessler, H. Opfer, and D. Wolff, “Multi-asset portfolio optimization and out-of-sample performance: An evaluation of black–litterman, mean-variance, and naïve diversification approaches,” The European Journal of Finance, 23, 1–30 (2014).

J. Knight and S. E. Satchell, “Exact properties of measures of optimal investment for benchmarked portfolios,” Quantitative Finance, 10, 495–502 (2009).

M. J. Best and R. R. Grauer, “Sensitivity analysis for mean-variance portfolio problems,” Management Science, 37, 980–989 (1991).

V. Kumar. Chopra and W. T. Ziemba, “The effect of errors in means, variances, and covariances on Optimal Portfolio Choice,” The Journal of Portfolio Management, 19, 6–11 (1993).

F. Becker, M. Gürtler, and M. Hibbeln, “Markowitz versus Michaud: Portfolio optimization strategies reconsidered,” The European Journal of Finance, 21, 269–291 (2013).

J.-R. Yu, W.-J. Paul Chiou, W.-Y. Lee, and S.-J. Lin, “Portfolio models with return forecasting and transaction costs,” International Review of Economics & Finance, 66, 118–130 (2020).

P. Jorion, “International portfolio diversification with estimation risk,” The Journal of Business, 58, 259-278 (1985). doi:10.1086/296296.

Y. Okhrin and W. Schmid, “Distributional properties of portfolio weights,” Journal of Econometrics, 134, 235–256 (2006).

W. James and C. Stein, “Estimation with quadratic loss,” Springer Series in Statistics, 443–460 (1992).

R. Layard, G. Mayraz, and S. Nickell, “The marginal utility of income,” Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1846–1857 (2008).

Downloads

Published

09-04-2024