The Impact of CATL's ESG Implementation on Its Enterprise Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/2wrygb02Keywords:
ESG, Enterprise Performance, CATL, Environmental, Sustainable Development.Abstract
In recent years, enterprises have gradually realized the significant influence of the Environmental, Social and Governance(ESG)on corporate performance. This article aims to explore that how ESG factors affect the performance of Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited (CATL), a globally leading company in new energy innovation and technology. Based on relevant research on the relationship between ESG and corporate performance, the analysis is carried out from three perspectives: environmental, social, and corporate governance, to examine the impact of CATL's ESG practices on both its financial and non-financial performance. The results indicate that CATL's active implementation of ESG is conducive to improving the company's financial performance as well as enhancing its performance in environmental, social, and corporate governance aspects. As one of the representative enterprises in China's new energy industry, the analysis of CATL in this article provides insights for the sustainable development of other enterprises and calls for improving the national information disclosure system of ESG.
Downloads
References
Li, Z., & Chen, J. (2023). Corporate ESG performance and corporate short-term debt for long-term use. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 40(12), 152-171.
Li, J., Yang, Z., Chen, J., et al. (2021). Study on the mechanism of ESG promoting corporate performance: Based on the perspective of corporate innovation. Science of Science and Management of S.&.T, 42(9), 71-89.
Zhu, Q., Zou, T., Cui, X., et al. (2020). Research on the impact of corporate environmental performance on financial performance—Based on the regulatory effect analysis of different types of government intervention. Economy and Management, 34(4), 72-81.
Lo, C. K. Y., Yeung, A. C. L., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2012). The impact of environmental management systems on financial performance in the fashion and textiles industries. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 561-567.
Bissoondoyal-Bheenick, E., Brooks, R., & Du, H. (2023). ESG and firm performance: The role of size and media channels. Economic Modelling, 121, 106203.
Reid, A., Ringel, E., & Pendleton, S. M. (2024). Transparency reports as CSR reports: Motives, stakeholders, and strategies. Social Responsibility Journal, 20(1), 81-107.
Sabri, B., Alexis, C., Riadh, M., & et al. (2020). Does corporate social responsibility reduce financial distress risk?. Economic Modelling, 91, 835-851.
Lin, B., & Rao, J. (2009). Why do listed companies disclose the auditor's internal control reports voluntarily? — An empirical study based on signaling theory in China. Accounting Research, 2(2), 45-52+93-94.
Wang, J., & Zhang, H. (2021). Political transparency, corporate governance, and economic significance. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 19(1), 49-66.
Geoffrey, C. K., & Gavin, J. N. (2003). Board composition and corporate performance: How the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(3), 189-205.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
