QCA Analysis of the Impact of Digital Economy on Export Technological Complexity: A Study Based on the Social and Economic Data of 31 Provinces in China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/0nzwjp11Keywords:
Digital Economy, Export Technological Complexity, Technological-Economic Paradigm, QCA, Regional Social and Economic Data.Abstract
The digital economy, characterized by informatization and big data as key factors of production, and relying on digital technologies such as the internet and artificial intelligence, represents a new economic paradigm. Its potential to facilitate the transformation and upgrading of manufacturing industries and to enhance the technological complexity of exports necessitates empirical testing. This paper examines the association between factors related to the digital economy and the technological complexity of exports, drawing upon socioeconomic data from 31 provinces and regions in China in 2021, and employing a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis approach. The findings suggest that the digital economy can indeed foster an increase in the technological complexity of exports. Human capital, research and development (R&D) capabilities, digital infrastructure, financial capital, government scale, and market size all exert a positive influence on the technological complexity of exports. The impact configurations of the digital economy on the technological complexity of exports can be classified into two main types: government-market driven R&D innovation, and digital infrastructure-led multifactor influenced. Within the latter category, four subtypes are distinguished: digital infrastructure single-factor dominance, digital infrastructure-led with weak market, digital infrastructure-led with insufficient government strength, and digital infrastructure-led with weak R&D. In areas with a higher level of digital economy, its influence on the technological complexity of exports is notably more positive. The construction of digital infrastructure and R&D capabilities are core conditions affecting whether a region can achieve a high level of technological complexity in exports. Concurrently, attracting human capital, increasing government support, and expanding market size are also factors that cannot be overlooked.
Downloads
References
WU Xiaoyi, ZHANG Yajing. An analysis of the status quo and international competitiveness of China’s digital economy. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(5): 250 - 258.
Fei Wang, Benhai Guo, Zixing Wang, Yuxin Wu. The impact of digital economy on the export competitiveness of China's manufacturing industry [J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(4): 7253-7272.
Chang J, Lan Q, Tang W, Chen H, Liu J, Duan Y. Research on the Impact of Digital Economy on Manufacturing Total Factor Productivity. Sustainability. 2023; 15(7): 5683.
Reza Najarzadeh, Farzad Rahimzadeh, Michael Reed, Does the Internet increase labor productivity? Evidence from a cross-country dynamic panel, Journal of Policy Modeling, Volume 36, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 986-993, ISSN 0161-8938, 2014.10.003.
Kan D, Lyu L, Huang W, Yao W. Digital Economy and the Upgrading of the Global Value Chain of China’s Service Industry. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2022; 17(4): 1279-1296.
Guo, Y., & Jiang, F. (2023). How Does the Digital Economy Drive High-Quality Regional Development? New Evidence from China. Evaluation Review, 0(0).
Hausmann, R., Hwang, J. Rodrik, D. What You Export Matters [J]. Journal of Economic Growth, 2007, 12(1): 1-25.
ABELIANSKY L, HILBERT M. Digital Technology and International Trade: Is it the Quantity of Subscriptions or the Quality of Date Speed the Matters? [J]. Telecommunications Policy,2016(1):35-48
Aghion, P., Howitt, P. & Prantl, S. Patent rights, product market reforms, and innovation. J Econ Growth 20, 223–262 (2015).
FREEMAN C, PEREZ C. Technical revolutions and financial capital: The dynamics of bubbles and golden ages [M]. Chel-tenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2002: 38-66.
YANG Qingfeng, LI Xiaohua. Study of technological economy paradigm structures, constraint factors and development strategies of booming digital economy [J]. Journal of Hubei University (Philosophy and Social Science),2021,48(1): 126 -136.
Dong, P.; Zhu, Y.; Duan, S.; Wu, M.; Bao, J. How Does the Digital Economy Promote a Culture of Business Innovation? A Study Based on Human Capital Allocation Perspective. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6511.
David J. Teece, Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world, Research Policy, Volume 47, Issue 8, 2018, Pages 1367-1387, ISSN 0048-7333
Z. Li and Y. Liu, "Research on the Spatial Distribution Pattern and Influencing Factors of Digital Economy Development in China," in IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 63094-63106, 2021
Lin Liang, Yan Li, How does government support promote digital economy development in China? The mediating role of regional innovation ecosystem resilience, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 188, 2023,122328, ISSN 0040-1625
Huang, S.; Ye, W.; Han, F. Does the Digital Economy Promote Industrial Collaboration and Agglomeration? Evidence from 286 Cities in China. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14545.
FISS P C. A set-theoretic approach to organizational con-figurations [J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(4): 1180-1198.
Hausmann,R., Hwang, J. Rodrik, D. What You Export Matters [J]. Journal of Economic Growth, 2007, 12(1): 1-25.
STUETZER M, AUDRETSC D B, OBSCHONKA M, et al. Entrepreneurship culture, knowledge spillovers, and the growth of regions. Regional Studies, 2018, 52 (5): 603-618.
WANG Jian, ZHANG Chi. Product variety decisions for R&D capability improvement L]. Studies in Science of Science, 2020, 38(11): 2008 -2019.
WEN Jun, YAN Zhijun, CHENG Yu. Digital economy and upgrading regional innovation capacity. Inquiry into Eco-nomic Issues, 2019(11): 112-124.
THORNTON J. Government size and the stability of out put: Evidence from emerging market economies. Applied Eco-nomics Letters, 2010, 17(8): 733-736.
QIU Bin, YIN Wei. Does China's manufacturing exports have domestic market effects?. The Journal of World Econo-my, 2010, 33(7): 44 -63.
RAGIN C C. Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond M. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008: 56-78.
Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C., & Aguilera, R.V. (2018). Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis: Best practices in strategy and organization research. Strategic Organization, 16(4), 482-495.
FISSPC.A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations [J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(4):1180-1198.
SCHNEIDER C Q, WAGEMANN C. Set - theoretic methods for the social science: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012: 101-148.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
