A Review of Research on Structural Holes and Innovation Performance

Bo Xu

doi:10.54097/jp8a9183

Authors

Bo Xu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/jp8a9183

Keywords:

structural hole; social network; innovation; innovation performance.

Abstract

With the development of globalization, firms are facing increasingly fierce competition. In such an environment, innovation has become an inevitable choice for companies to survive and develop, and is a hot topic studied by management scholars. Especially in high-tech industries, innovation has a particularly prominent impact on a company’s survival and prosperity. Technical innovation involves high levels of uncertainty and requires significant amounts of time and resources, so firms typically engage in strategic alliances to conduct joint research and exchange knowledge and information. In this process, innovation networks become an important source of innovation for companies, and the transfer, sharing, integration, and absorption of technical knowledge are all accomplished through innovation networks. As an important structure in innovation networks, structural holes can provide novel and heterogeneous information and knowledge. firms occupying positions in structural holes have information and control advantages, and by integrating different information, firms are more likely to create new knowledge. Therefore, the study of structural holes has become a focus of management research, and can play a significant role in promoting the development of social network and social capital theory. This paper systematically studies structural holes and innovation performance by reviewing existing research and defining the basic concepts and classifications of structural holes. In addition, relevant studies on the relationship between structural holes and innovation performance are summarized from the organizational, team, and individual levels, with a focus on the relationship between structural holes and firm innovation performance. Finally, based on the shortcomings of current research on structural holes and innovation performance, future research prospects are proposed to further promote the development of research in this area.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Burt, R.S. (1992). Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA, Harvard.

Burt, R. S. (2007). Secondhand brokerage: Evidence on the importance of local structure for managers, bankers, and analysts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 119-148.

Burt, R. S. (2012). Network-related personality and the agency question: Multirole evidence from a virtual world. American Journal of Sociology, 118(3), 543-591.

Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative science quarterly, 716-749.

Gargiulo, M., & Benassi, M. (2000). Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organization science, 11(2), 183-196.

Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative science quarterly, 48(2), 240-267.

Tortoriello, M. (2015). The social underpinnings of absorptive capacity: The moderating effects of structural holes on innovation generation based on external knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 36(4), 586-597.

Balkundi, P., Kilduff, M., Barsness, Z. I., & Michael, J. H. (2007). Demographic antecedents and performance consequences of structural holes in work teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 28(2), 241-260.

Xiao, Z., & Tsui, A. S. (2007). When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 1-31.

Tang, C., Zhang, G., & Naumann, S. E. (2017). When do structural holes in employees’ networks improve their radical creativity? A moderated mediation model. R&D Management, 47(5), 755-766.

Yang, Y., She, Y., Hong, J., & Gan, Q. (2021). The centrality and innovation performance of the quantum high-level innovation team: the moderating effect of structural holes. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 33(11), 1332-1346.

Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative science quarterly, 44(1), 82-111.

Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E. W. (2001). Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization science, 12(4), 502-517.

McEvily, B., & Zaheer, A. (1999). Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic management journal, 20(12), 1133-1156.

Powel, W. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1994). Networks and Economic Life, i NJ Smelser & R. Swedberg et al.(eds.) The Handbook of Economic Sociology.

Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in organizational behavior, 22, 345-423.

Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative science quarterly, 45(3), 425-455.

Obstfeld, D. (2005). Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 50(1), 100-130.

Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, 94, S95-S120.

Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American sociological review, 674-698.

March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization science, 2(1), 71-87.

Zang, J. (2018). Structural holes, exploratory innovation and exploitative innovation. Management Decision, 56(8), 1682-1695.

Chai, S. K., & Rhee, M. (2010). Confucian capitalism and the paradox of closure and structural holes in East Asian firms. Management and Organization Review, 6(1), 5-29.

Vasudeva, G., Zaheer, A., & Hernandez, E. (2013). The embeddedness of networks: Institutions, structural holes, and innovativeness in the fuel cell industry. Organization science, 24(3), 645-663.

Kim, T., Park, K., & Kim, E. (2018). Complementary or contradictory? The effects of structural holes and status on innovation. Innovation, 20(4), 393-406.

Wang, M., Lin, H., & Huang, Y. (2021). Structural holes and R&D investment: evidence from top management teams of China’s A-share listed firms. Applied Economics, 53(43), 4985-4999.

Zhou, X. (2022). Moderating Effect of Structural Holes on Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge-Innovation Performance: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Firms. Sustainability, 14(10), 5821.

Wen, J., Qualls, W. J., & Zeng, D. (2021). To explore or exploit: The influence of inter-firm R&D network diversity and structural holes on innovation outcomes. Technovation, 100, 102178.

Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management science, 52(11), 1661-1674.

Sheng, Y., & Fan, D. (2009). Theoretical classification of structural holes and their application in innovation networks. Studies in Science of Science, (09), 1407-1411.

Zhang, D., & Hu, Z. (2013). Research on the impact of network structural holes on enterprise technological innovation activities. Science Research Management, 34(6), 34-41.