The Impact of Investor Expectation on the Financial Decision-Making
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/nf8m2446Keywords:
Investor Expectation, Financial Decision-Making, Behavirol Finance.Abstract
This paper delves into a fundamental analysis of two significant standards in budgetary financial matters: efficient market hypothesis and behavioral finance. The efficient market hypothesis posits that financial markets efficiently process all available information, leading market participants to make rational decisions. This theory underscores the accuracy of market predictions and the efficiency of information processing. In contrast, behavioral finance challenges the efficient markets theory by revealing various cognitive biases and irrational behaviors that influence financial decisions, casting doubt on the accuracy of market predictions and the rationality of market behavior. Through a comprehensive investigation, this article aims to compare these two hypotheses and evaluate their impact on understanding financial markets and decision-making processes. By providing insights into how market efficiency and behavioral inconsistencies coexist and influence financial practice, this article aims to contribute to the ongoing discourse in monetary economics. By delving into these contrasting theories, this paper aims to provide valuable insights into how market efficiency and behavioral factors interact and shape financial outcomes.
Downloads
References
Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25 (2), 383-417.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185 (4157), 1124-1131.
Shiller, R. J. (1981). Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in dividends. Social Science Research Network.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47 (2), 263–291.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106 (4), 1039-1061.
Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. *The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110 (1), 73-92.
Odean, T. (1998). Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? The Journal of Finance, 53 (5), 1775-1798.
Barberis, N., Huang, M., & Santos, T. (2001). Prospect theory and asset prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116 (1), 1-53.
Luo, J., Subrahmanyam, A., & Titman, S. (2019). A Parsimonious Model of Momentum and Reversals in Financial Markets. UCLA Anderson Review.
Tai, Y. (2014). Investor Overreaction in Asian and US Stock Markets: Evidence from the 2008 Financial Crisis. The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, 8 (3), 71-93.
McBrayer, G. A. (2015). Information Propagation in Financial Markets.
Modi, A. (2023). Unveiling Market Inefficiencies: Investigating the Neglected Stock Anomaly and Reversal Anomaly. International Journal of Science and Research, 12 (9), 320-324.
Werner F. M. De Bondt, & Thaler, R. (1985). Does the Stock Market Overreact? The Journal of Finance, 40 (3), 793–805.
Jiang, L., & Lao, L. (2022). Identifying inconsistency in short-term reversal: evidence from the Chinese stock market. Applied Economics Letters, 30 (20), 2894-2901.
Abiprayu, K. (2022). Market Overreaction and Price Reversal in Indonesia Stock Market: Disposition Effect Examination. Management Analysis Journal, 11 (2), 159-166.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211 (4481), 453-458.
Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76 (2), 149-188.
Druckman, J. N. (2001). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? The Journal of Politics, 63 (4), 1041-1066.
LeBoeuf, R. A., & Shafir, E. (2003). Deep thoughts and shallow frames: On the susceptibility to framing effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16 (2), 77-92.
Thaler, R. H. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1 (1), 39–60.
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1990). Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98 (6), 1325–1348.
List, J. A. (2004). Neoclassical theory versus prospect theory: Evidence from the marketplace. Econometrica, 72 (2), 615-625.
Ericson, K. M. M., & Fuster, A. (2011). Expectations as endowments: Evidence on reference-dependent preferences from exchange and valuation experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126 (4), 1879-1907.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
