The Influence of Equity Incentive on Corporate Debt Default Risk

Authors

  • Ting Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/v92t0f23

Keywords:

Equity incentive; debt default risk; financial condition.

Abstract

As researchers show more interest in debt default risk, work on influencing factors of this risk is put a particular emphasis. Because risk preference of management and corporate financial condition cannot be explained by their traits perfectly, this paper has argued association between equity and debt default risk. Selecting 323 listed enterprises as sample, the study uses descriptive analysis and multiple linear regression analysis to determine the relationship of these two indicators. According to the analysis results, large proportion of equity incentives to the total share capital has passive impact on financial condition. It brings heavy credit burden to companies while large proportion of managerial ownership can decrease debt default risk and promote the stability of financial system. This paper strengthens the idea that there is reasonable and significant association between equity incentive and debt default risk. It also proves that different measuring factors of equity incentive have different directions effects on corporate debt default risk.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Duncan R B. Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative science quarterly, 1972, 313-327.

Bevan, Garzarelli. Corporate bond spreads and the business cycle. The Journal of Fixed Income, 2010, (6): 54-61.

Kuehn L A, Schmid L. Investment-based corporate bond pricing. The Journal of Finance, 2014, 69(6): 2741-2776.

Acharya V V, Bharath S T, Srinivasan A. Does industry-wide distress affect defaulted firms? Evidence from creditor recoveries. Journal of Financial Economics, 2007, 85(3): 787-821.

Xinyue Zhang, He Tao. Mismatch of investment and financing maturity with corporate bond default risk. Journal of Research on financial issues, 2022, (02): 63-71.

Yeh Y H, Lee T S. Corporate Governance and financial distress: evidence from Taiwan. Corporate Governance An International Review, 2010, 12(3): 378-388.

Wang Weixing, Zhang Jiajia. A research on the influence of managers’ background characteristics on credit risk of small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Nanjing Audit University, 2018, 15(03): 33-44.

Zhang Min, Zhengfei Lu, Caidong Chen. Managerial overconfidence, firm expansion and financial distress. Review of Economic Research, 2009, 44(01): 131-143.

Hambrick D C, Mason P A. Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9(02): 193-206.

Richard L P, Douglas W L, Gregory G D. Inherent limitations of demographic proxies in top management team heterogeneity research. Journal of management, 1999, 25(6): 935-953.

Ferrella L, et al. Socially responsible firms. Journey of Financial Economics, 2016.

Wu Min, Yu Lu. The impact of equity incentives on the performance of main board companies. Cooperative Economy and Technology, 2024, (01): 129-131.

Yeguo Tang, Xiangyi Xu. Relevance of equity incentive and technology innovation investment for small and medium listed companies:on different ultimate property rights. Finance and Trade Research, 2012, 23(02): 127-133.

Putri H T. The prediction of bankruptcy with Altman Z-Score and Springate S-Score models in sharia banks period 2012-2017. Journal Manajemen dan Sains, 2019, 4(2): 276-282.

Cui Can. Research on dividend policy of listed companies in China. Management & Technology of SME, 2021, (11): 155-157.

Downloads

Published

16-06-2024