From the Perspective of Originality: Analysis of the Legal Nature of Artificial Intelligence Products

Authors

  • Jiaming Lu
  • Tianqi Wang
  • Yahui Zhao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/r3a35344

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence generated content, Legal attribute, Originality.

Abstract

With the rapid proliferation of advanced artificial intelligence, such as GPT, the volume of AI-generated content on the internet has surged significantly. Consequently, the question of whether AI-generated content should be safeguarded by copyright law has emerged as a critical issue in both academic and practical domains. The determination of the eligibility of AI-generated content for copyright protection hinges on the assessment of its originality. Current research in the field of AI-generated content copyrightability has brought to light two distinct standards of originality: subjective and objective. However, a challenge arises when weighing the merits and drawbacks of these two standards. Given the inherent complexity of AI-generated content, a singular standard may not comprehensively and accurately encapsulate its attributes. Therefore, the most judicious approach at present appears to be a fusion of the subjective and objective standards, thereby embracing a more comprehensive framework that accounts for the nuanced nature of AI-generated content and its potential for originality under copyright law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Yang Lihua, Wang Shitong. Thinking about the copyright objectivity of artificial intelligence generated content - also on the selection of originality criteria for judging works. Journal of Beihang University (Social Science Edition), 2023, 9: 3-7.

Yang Shuxing. Subjectivist criteria for judgment of originality of works. Electronic Intellectual Property, 2007, 8: 64- 65.

Claude Colombe. Basic principles of copyright and neighboring rights in countries around the world - A comparative legal study. Gao Linghan(Translated), Shanghai:Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 1995.

Hegel. Principles of legal philosophy. Fan Yang, Zhang Qitai(Translated), Commercial Press, 1995.

Wang Qian. On the qualification of content generated by artificial intelligence in Copyright Law. Legal Science, 2017, 5: 148-155.

Hu Chen. On the non-copyrightability of content generated by artificial intelligence - focusing on the form of expression. Journal of Chongqing University (Social Science Edition), 20 Mar. 2024, Retrieved from: http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/50.1023.C.20210705.1346.002.html.

Song Hongsong. Positioning of intellectual property law of pure "artificial intelligence creation". Journal of Soochow University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 6: 50-56.

M.Raybould. Copyright Law. Zhang Enmin(Translated), Law Press, 2004.

Li Weimin. The correctness of artificial intelligence intellectual achievements in Copyright Law - A discussion with professor Wang Qian. Eastern Methodology, 2018, 3: 152-155.

Yi Jiming. Are artificial intelligence creations works?. Legal Science, 2017, 5: 139.

Yang Lihua. Exploration of copyright issues of artificial intelligence generated works. Modern Law, 2021, 4: 105.

Zheng Yuanmin, He Xuxi. Review of the protection path of artificial intelligence generated works from a resultant perspective. Science and Law, 2020, 3: 14.

Downloads

Published

08-08-2024