Managing Copyright Infringement Risks in Generative Artificial Intelligence Data Mining

Authors

  • Jing Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/3p0kpc23

Keywords:

Copyright infringement, Rational use system, Opt-out mechanism, Tortious liability.

Abstract

In the era of artificial intelligence, the rapid development of generative artificial intelligence represented by ChatGPT brings great convenience to human creation, but also causes many potential copyright risks and brings a series of new challenges to the field of intellectual property. The creative process of generative artificial intelligence mainly includes four stages: training data input, data learning, input instruction and content generation. Among them, the legal use of copyright works in the data input stage needs to be solved instantly. In order to solve this problem, we should first improve the “fair use system” under current Copyright Law, divide machine learning into expressive and non-expressive types according to whether generative artificial intelligence has expressive content output, and discuss whether it constitutes fair use separately. Secondly, in order to protect the legitimate rights of original copyright owners, it is also necessary to improve the transparency of training data and increase the “opt-out” mechanism. In addition, it is also necessary to clarify the tort liability subject of generative artificial intelligence by legislation when it does not constitute fair use.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Getty Images(US), Inc.v. Stability AI, Inc., Feb.3, 2023, No.23-cv-00135.

Gu Nanfei, Fang Zhouzhi. Reasonable boundary and infringement regulation of generative AI use works such as ChatGPT. Digital Library Forum, 2019,19 (07): 1-8.

Song Weifeng. Generative AI communication paradigm: Copyright risk and regulatory construction of AI-Generated content -- Based on the world's first AIGC infringement Case. Press & News, 2023, (10): 87-96.

Zhan Ailan, Tian Yinong. Copyright risk in generative artificial intelligence machine learning and its solution path. Electronic Intellectual Property, 2023, (11): 4-14.

Xu Wei. On the legal status and liability of generative artificial intelligence service providers: A case study of ChatGPT. Law Science (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law), 2023, 41 (4): 69-80.

Benjamin L., W. Sobel. Artificial intelligence’s fair use crisis. Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2017, 41: 45-49.

Matthew Sag. Copyright and copy-reliant technology. Northwestern University Law Review, 2009, 103(4): 1983.

Wu Handong. Questions on the copyright law of artificial intelligence-generated. Chinese and Foreign Law, 2020, 32 (03): 653-673.

Lee An. Copyright rules for machine learning: Historical implications and contemporary solutions. Global Law Review, 2023, 45 (06): 97-113.

Wang Qian. On the characterization of artificial intelligence-generated content in Copyright Law. Forum on Political Science and Law, 2023, 41 (04): 16-33.

Shao Honghong. Research on copyright infringement of generative artificial intelligence. Publication and Distribution Research, 2023, (06): 29-38.

Peng Feirong. On the copyright infringement risk of data in algorithm creation and its resolution. Journal of Application of Law, 2023, (4) : 46-55.

Downloads

Published

08-08-2024