Research on the Impact of Incentive Measures on the Performance of Efficient Technology Transfer

-- Mediated by Psychological Ownership

Authors

  • Yina Yang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v1i.2675

Keywords:

Incentive System; University Technology Transfer; Psychological Ownership.

Abstract

In the era of "big science", science and technology are gradually commercialized. Governments, enterprises and other organizations have invested a lot of financial, human and institutional resources in colleges and universities to help colleges and universities to transform technological achievements. However, the rate of technology transfer in my country is still not high. Therefore, this article focuses on identifying factors that affect technology transfer and proposes countermeasures to improve technology transfer performance, constructing incentive measures, psychological ownership, market orientation, and efficient technology transfer performance models, and discussing the impact of university incentives on technology transfer performance. The conclusion shows that: incentive measures have a positive impact on the performance of university technology transfer; psychological ownership plays a part of the intermediary role between incentive measures and university technology transfer performance, that is, incentive measures can have a direct impact on university technology transfer performance, or through psychological ownership. It has an indirect impact; the market orientation positively regulates the relationship between psychological ownership and the performance of university technology transfer. Identify key factors and provide reasonable enlightenment for colleges and universities to improve the performance of technology transfer.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rao Kai, Meng Xianfei, Xu Liang, et al The impact of R&D investment on the patent technology transfer activities of local universities -- an empirical analysis based on provincial panel data [J] Management Review, 2013, 25 (05): 144-154.

Zhou Fenghua, Zhu Xuezhong Research on Resource Factors and University Technology Transfer Performance [J] Research and Development Management, 2007 (05): 87-94.

Swamidass P M, Vulasa V. Why university inventions rarely produce income? Bottlenecks in university technology transfer[J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2009(No.4):343-363.

Macho-Stadler I, Pérez-Castrillo D, Veugelers R. Licensing of university inventions: The role of a technology transfer office[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2007(No.3):483-510.

Ye Jingyi, Yang Yang, Han Jiawei, et al Input, Implicit Factors and Transformation of University Technological Achievements -- An Empirical Analysis Based on Chinese University Patent Sales Data [J] Economic Science, 2014 (05): 103-117.

Colyvas J A. From divergent meanings to common practices: The early institutionalization of technology transfer in the life sciences at Stanford University[J]. Research Policy, 2007(No.4):456-476.

Pierce J L K T. Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations (Article)[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2001(No.2):298-310.

Pierce J L J D, O'Driscoll M P, Coghlan A. Work Environment Structure and Psychological Ownership: The Mediating Effects of Control. [J]. Journal of Social Psychology, 2004(No.5):507-534.

Wang Y J, LaPlaca P, Guo C, et al. Implementing Interfunctionally-Coordinated Market Orientation in Industrial SMEs: Lessons Learned in Commodity Markets. [J]. Journal of Managerial Issues, 2017(No.4): 428-449.

Mowery D C, Sampat B N. University Patents and Patent Policy Debates in the USA, 1925– 1980[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2001(No.3):781-814.

Liu Fang, Wang Hao Research on the relationship between organizational psychological ownership and work attitude, behavior and results [J] Soft Science, 2010, 24 (09): 124-128.

Pan Xiaofu, Qin Qiwen, Zhang Yonghong, et al The influence of organizational psychological ownership and organization-based self-esteem on positive organizational behavior [J] Psychological Science, 2012,35 (03): 718-724.

Chang S C S, Jia L J L, Takeuchi R T R, et al. Do High-Commitment Work Systems Affect Creativity? A Multilevel Combinational Approach to Employee Creativity. [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2014 (No.4): 665-680.

Narver J C U W, Slater S F. The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. [J]. Journal of Marketing, 1990(No.4):20-35.

Wang Yongmei, Wang Zheng, Zhang Li Empirical Study on the Factors Affecting the Performance of Technology Transfer of Scientific Research Institutes -- Based on the Perspective of Technology Suppliers [J] Science of Science and Management of Science and Technology, 2014,35 (11): 108-116.

van Dyne L V M E, Pierce J L. Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2004(No.4):439-459.

Berg B L A D. Effects of cultural difference on technology transfer projects: an empirical study of Taiwanese manufacturing companies[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2001(NO.5):287.

Downloads

Published

28-11-2022

How to Cite

Yang, Y. (2022). Research on the Impact of Incentive Measures on the Performance of Efficient Technology Transfer: -- Mediated by Psychological Ownership. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 1, 350-361. https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v1i.2675