Analysis of Young Consumers' Consumption Behavior from the Perspective of Behavioral Economics

Authors

  • Hengshuo Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/x7ntqg50

Keywords:

Economic Perspective, Young Consumers, Consumption Behavior.

Abstract

As the pace of economic development in China continues to accelerate and wage levels increase, more people are achieving financial prosperity, with young consumers displaying distinct consumption characteristics. Consequently, they have become a key focus of research for Chinese economists. National consumption, as an important component of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), is a crucial factor in promoting steady economic growth. Under the guidance of existing behavioral economics theories, consumer behavior, influenced by various psychological and environmental factors such as personal intentions and market conditions, can be categorized into two main patterns: rational consumption behavior and irrational consumption behavior. Therefore, analyzing young consumers' consumption behavior from an economic perspective is beneficial for the research and formulation of relevant economic policies in China. It also helps correct abnormal consumption behaviors, thereby promoting rational and scientific consumption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Azamussan, S., Shanmugam, M. (2022), An empirical examination of the effects of demographic groups on socially responsible consumption behaviour, Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 18, No. 5, 951-967, doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-06-2020-0253.

[2] Bai C, Wang S, Ma W, 2010, Research on Cognitive Bias of Sports Lottery Consumers from the Perspective of Behavioral Economics. Journal of Nanjing Institute of Physical Education: Social Science Edition, 24(3): 119–123.

[3] Han Z, Qiao Y, Shao X, 2019, Effectiveness Analysis of CAPM Series Models: A Comparative Analysis Based on Industry Data in the Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Hong Kong Stock Markets. Investment Research, 2019(10): 115–132.

[4] Kamenidou I, Stavrianea A, Bara E-Z. (2020) Generational Differences toward Organic Food Behavior: Insights from Five Generational Cohorts, Sustainability. 12(6):2299, doi.org/10.3390/su12062299.

[5] Jarosz-Angowska A., Angowski M., Kakol M., Nowak A., Rozanska-Boczula M, (2020). Agricultural Competitive Potential and Competitive Position in the International Trade of Agricultural and Food Products in the European Union, European Research Studies Journal Volume XXIII Special Issue 2, 779-803 DOI: 10.35808/ersj/1898.

[6] Lin M, Cai X, 2016, Research on the Hypothesis of Rational “Economic Man” and the Political Economy of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics. Fujian Forum: Humanities and Social Sciences Edition, 2016(5): 13–21.

[7] Zheng Y, Fan X, 2011, The Social Psychological Motivation and Management Implications of Proud Buying Behavior: A Multi-perspective Analysis Based on Chinese Cultural Background. Journal of Beijing Business University: Social Sciences Edition, 2011(3): 7–11.

[8] Liu S, Zhang N, Liang Q, 2010, Intergenerational Inheritance and Evolution of Chinese Consumer Cultural Values: An Empirical Study Based on Mainstream Consumer Groups in China. Journal of Shenzhen University: Humanities and Social Sciences Edition, 2010(6): 77–84.

[9] Wang Z, Guo X, Li H, 2017, Will the Process of Regional Marketization Promote Local Governments to Choose PPP Mode Financing —— Empirical Research Based on Infrastructure. Financial Research, 2017(10): 54–64.

[10] Li J, Zhang P, Zhang Z, 2019, From “Economic Man” to “Social Man”: The Impact of the Rise of Behavioral Economics on Urban Planning in China. Research on Urban Development, 26(4): 31–36.

[11] Jiang L, Gong X, Lu J, et al., 2016, A study on the Impact of Consumer Expectations on Residents’ Willingness to Consume: The Mediating Effect of Psychological Account Flexibility. Consumer Economy, 32(4): 54–60.

Downloads

Published

19-11-2024

How to Cite

Zhang, H. (2024). Analysis of Young Consumers’ Consumption Behavior from the Perspective of Behavioral Economics. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 42, 30-36. https://doi.org/10.54097/x7ntqg50