Research on the Digital Transformation Path of Risk Management in Commercial Banks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/91qaad18Keywords:
Digital Transformation, Commercial Banks, Risk Management.Abstract
As economic uncertainties and complexities increase, along with the application of digital technology, the risks faced by commercial banks have become more diversified, complex, and novel. Once risks materialize, they can potentially lead to crises, posing significant hidden dangers to the high-quality development of commercial banks. Despite various risk prevention measures adopted by commercial banks, the absolute amount of non-performing loans remains high each year. In recent years, driven by rapid financial technology development and macroeconomic policies, a digital wave has swept through the banking sector. Chinese banks have accelerated their digital transformation across various aspects, offering customers better and more diverse financial products and services. However, the emergence of new products and tools also brings numerous issues that need to be explored and addressed. Therefore, this paper takes commercial banks as an example to explore the main risk issues arising during digital transformation. It integrates the inherent advantages of digital technology to innovate and apply new digital technologies, continuously improving the governance system of digital transformation in risk management.
Downloads
References
[1] Beltratti A, Stulz RM. The credit crisis around the globe: why did some banks perform better? Journal of Financial Economics (2012) 105 (1), 1–17.
[2] Wang R, Liu J, Luo H. Fintech development and Bank risk taking in China. Eur J Finance (2021) 27(4-5):397–418.
[3] Bakoush M, Gerding EH, Wolfe S. Margin requirements and systemic liquidity risk. J Int Financial Markets, Institutions Money (2018) 58:78–95.
[4] Gang J, Qian Z. China’s monetary policy and systemic risk. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade (2015) 51(4):701–13.
[5] Yin F, Jiao X, Zhou J, Yin X, Ibeke E, Iwendi MG, et al. Fintech application on banking stability using big data of an emerging economy. J Cloud Comput (2022) 11(1): 43.
[6] Cincinelli P, Pellini E, Urga G. Leverage and systemic risk pro-cyclicality in the Chinese financial system. Int Rev Financial Anal (2021) 78.
[7] Li C, He S, Tian Y, Sun S, Ning L. Does the bank’s fintech innovation reduce its risk-taking? Evidence from China’s banking industry. J Innovation Knowledge (2022) 7(3):100219.
[8] Beck T, Demirgüç-Kunt A, Levine R. Bank concentration, competition, and crises: first results. J Banking Finance (2006) 30(5):1581–603.
[9] Yi F, Yanru W, Qi W, Yang Z. Policy uncertainty and Bank systemic risk: a perspective of risk decomposition. J Int Financial Markets, Institutions Money (2023) 88.
[10] Riedl R, Benlian A, Hess T, Stelzer D, Sikora H. On the relationship between information management and digitalization. Business Inf Syst Eng (2017) 59(6):475–82.
[11] Cheng M, Qu Y. Does Bank fintech reduce credit risk? Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance J (2020) 63.
[12] Wibowo IGBE, Wibowo B. The effect of competition levels and banking concentration on systemic risks: Indonesia’s case. Indonesian Capital Market Rev (2019) 9(2).
[13] Wang D, Liu Y, Xu Y, Liu L. Fintech, macroprudential supervision and systemic risk in China’s banks. China Finance Econ Rev (2022) 11(4).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
