An Analysis of the Relationship Between Theoretical Economics and Applied Economics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/0xw51376Keywords:
Theoretical Economics, Applied Economics, Relationship.Abstract
With the increasing enhancement of China's economic strength, various theoretical aspects related to economics have garnered widespread attention from all sectors of society. Clarifying the concepts of theoretical economics and applied economics, and understanding the relationship between the two, has become a primary focus in numerous developmental fields today. Comparatively, any theoretical research requires consideration of practical outcomes. However, during the study of economic theories, deviations inevitably arise due to multiple influencing factors, and the content related to theoretical economics has not been highly emphasized, ultimately leading to problems in economic activities. Therefore, mastering the relationship between theoretical economics and applied economics to promote orderly economic activities has become an important direction for economic endeavors. This paper delves into the relationship between theoretical economics and applied economics, analyzes their significance within the field of economics, identifies current issues, and proposes effective strategies to promote the balanced development of both, aiming to provide valuable references for economic research and practice.
Downloads
References
[1] Bruno, B., Faggini, M., & Parziale, A. (2018). Innovation policies: Strategy of growth in a complex perspective. In Social Dynamics in a Systems Perspective (pp. 65–84). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
[2] Chakraborti, A., Sharma, H., & Pharasi, H. K. (2021). Phase separation and scaling in correlation structures of financial markets. Journal of Physics: Complexity, 2, 015002. [CrossRef]
[3] Budd, L., Sancino, A., Pagani, M., Kristmundsson, Ó., Roncevic, B., & Steiner, M. (2017). Sport as a complex adaptive system for place-based leadership: Comparing five European cities with different administrative and socio-cultural traditions. Local Economy, 32, 316–335. [CrossRef]
[4] Evans, J., Allan, N., & Cantle, N. (2017). A new insight into the World Economic Forum global risks. Economic Papers: A Journal of Applied Economics and Policy, 36, 185–197. [CrossRef]
[5] Byrne, D., & Callaghan, G. (2013). Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences: The State of the Art. London: Routledge.
[6] Espejo, R. (2018). Social dynamics in a systems perspective. In Social Dynamics in a Systems Perspective (pp. 121–135). Cham: Springer.
[7] Chae, B. K. (2012). An evolutionary framework for service innovation: Insights of complexity theory for service science. International Journal of Production Economics, 135, 813–822. [CrossRef]
[8] Stuart, M., Placona, A., Vece, G., Lindblad, K., Diallo, S., & Carrico, B. (2022). Perspective on macroscale complexity in the national transplant system. Complexity, 2022, 3221885. [CrossRef]
[9] Farmer, J., & Sidorowich, J. J. (1987). Predicting chaotic time series. Physical Review Letters, 59, 845. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Fontana, M. (2010). The Santa Fe perspective on economics: Emerging patterns in the science of complexity. History of Economic Ideas XVIII, 167–194.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
