Accessibility and Inequality of Park Green Space for Multi-age Distribution in Shanghai, China

Authors

  • Jiaqi Yang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/pxg8xg33

Keywords:

Park green space, Spatial accessibility, Spatial inequality, Two-step floating catchment area, Shanghai.

Abstract

The accessibility and inequality of public evaluation parks and green spaces are crucial for Shanghai, which is currently experiencing a continuous influx of new population while an aging society still exists. It helps to achieve better social equity in the allocation of parks and green spaces and the formulation and allocation of subsequent planning and construction. This study conducted a multidimensional test on the urban horizontal inequality of driving and walking in different regions and the overall accessibility of the urban park spaces, using two floating-point moving methods, Gini coefficient, and inequality index via ArcGIS and QGIS. The longitudinal evaluation was conducted on five different age groups. The findings shows that in regions with comparatively low traffic and population density, Shanghai's geographic location with the coverage of park green space is generally low. There are different accessibility situations in different areas because of the division of land use and the uneven distribution of green space in parks. Inequality worsens with age, especially in driving modes of transport and inner city areas. Together with theoretical backing and a basis for future planning, this research offers a succinct analysis and comprehension of the existing state of affairs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Yu Kongjian, Duan Tiewu, Li Dihua, Peng Jinfu. Landscape Accessibility as an Evaluation Method for Measuring the Functions of Urban Green Space System and Case Studies. Urban Planning, 1998, 23 (8): 8-11

[2] Song Zhengna, Chen Wen, Zhang GuiXiang, et al. Spatial Accessibility of Public Service Facilities and Its Measurement Methods. Advances in Geographical Science, 2010 (10): 69-76.

[3] Wolch J, Wilson J P, Fehrenbach J. Parks and park funding in Los Angeles: An equity-mapping analysis Urban Geo-graphy, 2005, 26 (1): 4-35.

[4] Joseph A E, Bantock P R. Measuring potential physical accessibility to general practitioners in rural areas: A method and case study. Social Science & Medicine, 1982, 16 (1): 85-90.

[5] Li Xin, Ma Xiaodong, Xue Xiaotong, et al. Urban green space supply and demand evaluation and layout optimization: A case study of Xuzhou central urban area. Geographical Science, 2019, 39 (11): 1771-1779.

[6] Chen X, Jia P. A comparative analysis of accessibility measures by the two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 2019, 33 (9): 1739-58.

[7] Farris FA. The Gini index and measures of inequality. The American Mathematical Monthly. 2010, 117 (10): 851-64.

[8] Wu SS, Cheng J, Lo SM, Chen CC, Bai Y. Coordinating urban construction and district-level population density for balanced development: An explorative structural equation modeling analysis on Shanghai. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021, 312: 127646.

[9] Zeng P, Dong Q, Helbich M, Liu Y, Wang X, Tian T, Che Y. Assessing the inequality of park's contributions to human wellbeing in Shanghai, China. Cities. 2024, 150: 105028.

[10] Stoia NL, Niţă MR, Popa AM, Iojă IC. The green walk—An analysis for evaluating the accessibility of urban green spaces. Urban forestry & urban greening. 2022, 75: 127685.

Downloads

Published

08-02-2025