The Influence of Public Sentiment on FDI is Analyzed by Extending Payphone’s Gravity Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/tgkp9k96Keywords:
FDI, Public sentiment, Relation.Abstract
Since Trump initiated the trade war against China, the impact of politics on the economy has significantly increased. In recent years, as China's economic power has grown, diplomatic conflicts between China and Japan, as well as China and South Korea, have become more frequent and intense. From the diplomatic level, to expand the interests of countries, foreign trade is an indispensable part of every country's diplomacy. A very important index of foreign trade is foreign direct investment. Foreign direct investment (FDI) has been crucial to China’s rapid economic growth since the 1980s. As China’s key trade partners in East Asia, Japan and South Korea have invested over $1.5 trillion in FDI in China. National sentiment reflects people's views on politics from the perspective of the people and can also reflect political changes to a certain extent. Therefore, this study reflects the change of political change to economic development to a certain extent through the impact of national sentiment on economy. This article uses the gravity model to estimate how national sentiment affects the inward FDI flows from Japan and South Korea. This study highlights the national sentiment in both Japan and South Korea. While research shows a positive correlation between public sentiment towards China in these two countries, the coefficient results indicate that the overall impact of national sentiment on FDI is limited. This article mainly analyzes the relationship between national sentiment and FDI in South Korea and Japan and subdivides the different foreign policies of these two countries. Additionally, countries demonstrate different levels of sensitivity to sentiment, suggesting further-segmented policies should be taken into consideration. Investigating these different sensitivities is useful for China's different national policies towards its own country.
Downloads
References
[1] Wei, Y. (1995). "China's FDI Strategy under Deng Xiaoping: Economic Reform and Global Integration." World Development, 23 (7), 1129 - 1145.
[2] Sushentsov, A., Wohlforth, W.C. The tragedy of US–Russian relations: NATO centrality and the revisionists’ spiral. Int Polit 57, 427 – 450 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311 - 020 - 00229 - 5.
[3] Borensztein, E., De Gregorio, J., & Lee, J. W. (1998). How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? Journal of International Economics, 45 (1), 115 – 135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996 (97) 00033 - 0.
[4] Sabir, S., Rafique, A. & Abbas, K. Institutions and FDI: evidence from developed and developing countries. Financ Innov 5, 8 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854 - 019 - 0123 - 7.
[5] Li Qing-Hua. (2022). Research on the impact of Japanese Direct Investment in China on the Scale and Structure of Bilateral Trade (Master's Thesis, Jilin University of Finance and Economics). Master of https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.26979/d.cnki.gccsc.2022.000110doi:10.26979/d.cnki.gccsc.2022.000110.
[6] Oyadeyi, O.O., Ibukun, C.O., Arogundade, S. et al. Unveiling economic resilience: exploring the impact of financial vulnerabilities on economic volatility through the economic vulnerability index. Discov Sustain 5, 253 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621 - 024 - 00438 - 5.
[7] Chi Yue. (2022). Research on the impact of South Korea's Investment in China on Sino-South Korea Bilateral Trade in Goods (Master's Thesis, Jilin University of Finance and Economics). Master of https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.26979/d.cnki.gccsc.2022.000063doi:10.26979/d.cnki.gccsc.2022.000063.
[8] Egresi, I., & Kara, F. (2014). Foreign Policy Influences on Outward Direct Investment: The Case of Turkey. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 17 (2), 181 – 203. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2014.993259.
[9] Capoani, L. Review of the gravity model: origins and critical analysis of its theoretical development. SN Bus Econ 3, 95 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546 - 023 - 00461 - 0.
[10] Gupta, R., Gozgor, G., Kaya, H. et al. Effects of geopolitical risks on trade flows: evidence from the gravity model. Eurasian Econ Rev 9, 515 – 530 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822 - 018 - 0118 - 0.
[11] Tinbergen, J. (1962). Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. The Twentieth Century Fund.
[12] Li, M. Y., Makino, S., & Jiang, C. (2019). Does national sentiment affect foreign direct investment, and if so, how? Additional evidence. International Business Review, 28 (5), 1 - 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101586.
[13] Lee, H.-H. M., & van Dolen, W. (2015). Creative participation: Collective sentiment in online co-creation communities. Information & Management, 52 (8), 951 – 964. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2015.07.002.
[14] Chi Yue. (2022). Research on the impact of South Korea's Investment in China on Sino-South Korea Bilateral Trade in Goods (Master's Thesis, Jilin University of Finance and Economics). Master of https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.26979/d.cnki.gccsc.2022.000063doi: 10.26979/d.cnki.gccsc.2022.000063.
[15] Hossain, M. K., & Hossain, M. S. (2023). Causal Interaction between Foreign Direct Investment Inflows and China’s Economic Growth. Sustainability, 15 (10), 7994. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107994.
[16] Truong, L. D., Friday, H. S., & Pham, T. D. (2022). The effects of geopolitical risk on foreign direct investment in a transition economy: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15 (3), 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15030105.
[17] Reichberg, G. M., & Syse, H. (2018). Threats and Coercive Diplomacy: An Ethical Analysis. Ethics & International Affairs, 32 (2), 179 – 202. doi: 10.1017/S0892679418000138.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Highlights in Business, Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






