The Application of the Anchoring Effect in Pricing, Consumer Purchases and Auctions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v11i.8100Keywords:
The Anchoring Effect, Consumer Purchases, Pricing, Auctions.Abstract
As an important theory in behavioral economics, the anchoring effect has been widely used in the analysis of economic market behavior in recent years. And scholars' research on this effect also involves all aspects of the economic field, which shows how anchoring has a significant impact. It greatly influences how people behave and has repercussions for all types of decision-making processes. Using the method of case study, this paper discusses and analyzes the definition, types, mechanisms, importance and especially the applications of anchoring. It initially reviews previous anchoring applications in pricing, consumer purchases and auctions. Based on the former research, more modified applications are introduced. First of all, when sellers are pricing, their subtle utilization of stereotypes, namely, reference pricing, is demonstrated. It is a stable and adaptable strategy that would be effective in helping firms earn more profits. Then, based on an experiment focusing on consumer purchases and decision-making bias, potential factors leading to and influencing anchoring are discussed, which may enable consumers to be clearly aware of current conditions and therefore come up with methods protecting themselves from being affected. Lastly, the anchoring effect can also explain the major mechanisms of auctions in today’s world. Based on that, the reason why classic auctions often begin with unimpressive initial reference prices but end with higher prices when deals are made is figured out. The conclusions drawn from this analysis can help consumers and investors avoid being affected by invalid information and behave more efficiently when they are making decisions.
Downloads
References
Fernandes, N. (2020). Economic effects of coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19) on the world economy.
Chang, E. C., Luo, Y., & Ren, J. (2013). Cross-listing and pricing efficiency: The informational and anchoring role played by the reference price. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37 (11), 4449 - 4464.
Wolk, A., Spann, M., 2008. The effects of reference prices on bidding behavior in interactive pricing mechanisms. Journal of Interactive Marketing 22, 2 - 18.
Furnham, A., & Boo, H. C. (2011). A literature review of the anchoring effect. The journal of socio-economics, 40 (1), 35 - 42.
Zong, Y., & Guo, X. (2022). An Experimental Study on Anchoring Effect of Consumers’ Price Judgment Based on Consumers’ Experiencing Scenes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 794135.
Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (1994). The limits of anchoring. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7 (4), 223 - 242.
Slovic, P. (1967). The relative influence of probabilities and payoffs upon perceived risk of a gamble. Psychonomic Science, 9 (4), 223 - 224.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. science, 185 (4157), 1124 - 1131.
Zou, D. Q., Wang, G., Zhao, P., and Wang, Y. (2007). The impact of functional value and symbolic value on brand loyalty: the moderating effect of gender differences and brand differences. Nankai Manag. Rev. 10, 4 – 12.
Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2006). The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic: why the adjustments are insufficient. Psychological science, 17 (4), 311 – 318.
Reitsma-van Rooijen, M., & Daamen, D. D. (2006). Subliminal anchoring: The effects of subliminally presented numbers on probability estimates. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42 (3), 380 - 387.
Mussweiler, T., & Englich, B. (2005). Subliminal anchoring: Judgmental consequences and underlying mechanisms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98 (2), 133 - 143.
Kristensen, H., & Gärling, T. (1997). The effects of anchor points and reference points on negotiation process and outcome. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 71 (1), 85 - 94.
Ku, G., Galinsky, A. D., & Murnighan, J. K. (2006). Starting low but ending high: A reversal of the anchoring effect in auctions. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 90 (6), 975.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






