A literature review of a cognitive heuristic: The anchoring effect

Yufan Liu

doi:10.54097/hbem.v11i.8110

Authors

Yufan Liu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v11i.8110

Keywords:

Anchoring effects, explanation models, avoiding methods.

Abstract

The anchoring effect has gained popularity as a cognitive heuristic that aims to explain judgment errors people may make in their decision-making process. This article reviews and documents the literature in this area and finds that there is ample and extensive research available on this topic. By summarizing the results of previous research, it is found that the anchoring effect is a pervasive judgment bias when people are in an uncertain decision-making environment, taking different forms and having varying degrees of influence on decision outcomes. Therefore, this paper aims to summarize the existing findings and build on them for further exploration. To achieve this, the paper takes the type of anchor as an entry point and analyzes how externally provided anchors and decision makers' self-generated anchors respectively influence the decision-making process. Afterward, the article further explores the underlying logic of the anchoring effect through its two explanatory models. Since the anchoring effect has long been considered one of the most robust and common cognitive heuristics, this article then demonstrates the breadth of its application by documenting the various domains in which it has been shown to occur. Finally, this review article suggests several methods in which each of the two types of anchors can be weakened to some extent.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Simon, H. A. (1955) “A behavioral model of rational choice,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69 (1), p. 99.

Shiloh, S., Salton, E. and Sharabi, D. (2002) “Individual differences in rational and intuitive thinking styles as predictors of heuristic responses and framing effects,” Personality and Individual Differences, 32 (3), pp. 415 – 429.

Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974) “Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,” Science, 185 (4157), pp. 1124 – 1131.

Epley, N. and Gilovich, T. (2001) “Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment heuristic: Differential Processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors,” Psychological Science, 12 (5), pp. 391 – 396.

Epley, N. and Gilovich, T. (2005) “When effortful thinking influences judgmental anchoring: Differential effects of forewarning and incentives on self-generated and externally provided anchors,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18 (3), pp. 199 – 212.

Wang Xiaozhuang, Bai Xuejun. Anchoring effects in judgment and decision making [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2009 (1): 7.

Lu, J. and Jiang, G. (2023) “Research on the anchoring effect of enterprise participation in green governance,” Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, (No.1), pp. 23 – 36.

Jacowitz, K.E. and Kahneman, D. (1995) “Measures of anchoring in estimation tasks, “Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21 (11), pp. 1161 – 1166.

Xiao, B. (2008) “A Study on Anchoring Effect for Inflation Expectation,” Journal of ShanXi Finance and Economics University, 30 (7), pp. 23 – 29.

Yang, R., Xiao, W. and Zhang, J. (2011) “A study of the factors influencing inflation expectations in China - based on the theory of anchoring effect and the theory of stress,” Northern Trade and Economics, 4, pp. 128 – 131.

Mussweiler, T. and Strack, F. (1999) “Hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming in the anchoring paradigm: A selective accessibility model,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35 (2), pp. 136 – 164.

Chapman, G.B. and Johnson, E.J. (1999) “Anchoring, activation, and the construction of values,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79 (2), pp. 115 – 153.

Tversky, A. (1977) “Features of similarity.,” Psychological Review, 84 (4), pp. 327 – 352.

Buljan, A. & Shapira, Z. 2005. “Attention to production schedule and safety as determinants of risk taking in NASA’s decision to launch the Columbia Shuttle.” In M. Farjoun & W. Starbuck (Eds). Management lessons from the Columbia Shuttle. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell.

Rao, P., Zhao, L and Yue, L. (2008) “Geely Mathematics and Stock Price,” Manage the World, 2008 (11).

Zhao, J. and Wu, F. (2009) “The price anomaly of financial assets under the cult of mathematics,” Economic Studies, 2009 (6).

Mussweiler, T., and Strack, F. (2001). Considering the impossible: Explaining the effects of impulsive anchors. Social Cognition, 19, 145 - 160.

Tang, Y. (2020) “Alert to anchoring effect in criminal trials” China People's Court Newspaper, 2020.

Xu, N. and Wu, S. (2009) “A Study on the Anchoring Effect in the Shareholding Reform of Listed Companies in China” Economic Studies, 2007 (1).

Chen, S. and Li, W. (2016) “A study of anchoring effect in M&A premium decision [J],” Economic Studies, 2016, 51 (06): 114 - 127.

Liu, R. Z., & Ding, Y. B... (2009). The "anchoring" effect of executive compensation in listed companies. Finance and accounting newsletter: A synthesis.

Mussweiler, T., Strack, F. and Pfeiffer, T. (2000) “Overcoming the inevitable anchoring effect: Considering the opposite compensates for selective accessibility,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26 (9), pp. 1142 – 1150.

Klenk, M. E. and Paritosh, P.K. (2017) Cognitive processes in quantitative estimation: Analogical anchors and causal adjustment, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.

Epley, N. and Gilovich, T. (2006) “The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic,” Psychological Science, 17 (4), pp. 311 – 318.