Alpha Strategy for Stripping Beta Returns for Pure Bond Funds

Authors

  • Jingwen Fan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v10i.8136

Keywords:

Pure bond fund; Multiple factor model; Beta; Alpha.

Abstract

Contemporarily alpha strategy is favorable by investors and funders for its stable performances among volatility market. Although alpha strategy shows great extra returns, it might have great drawdown on account of the stochastic fluctuations of the market (e.g., hedge funds’ poor performance during COVID-19 early state including Bridge Water). Despite from stocks and futures, the bond funds are rather a low volatility type underlying assets, hence the alpha strategy based on pure bond will be more favorable for risk aversion investors. By building a five-factor model, this paper dissolves the returns of pure bond funds to the five factors of level, slope, convex, credit and default, which are separated from each other, and Alpha, which is not directly explained by the factors, and verifies the effectiveness of this alpha factor for selecting pure bond funds. Taking 2019 to 2022 as the time interval, the group backtest results show that the alpha factor stripped of beta has a good effect on the selection of pure bond funds in China's public offering fund market, and the base selection ability is better than the Sharpe Ratio and other traditional risk-return factors. Overall, these results shed light on guiding further exploration of portfolio construction with high alpha based on bond funds.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Litterman R B, Scheinkman J A. Common factors affecting bond returns. The Journal of Fixed Income, 1991, 1(1): 54-61.

Fama E F, French K R. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of financial economics, 1993, 33(1): 3-56.

Jegadeesh N, Pennacchi G G. The behavior of interest rates implied by the term structure of corporate bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 1995, 37(2): 199-237.

Broussard J P, Stone, B. K. A multi-factor model for bond portfolio management. Journal of Fixed Income, 1996, 5(1): 51-61.

Duffee G. The relation between treasury yields and corporate bond yield spreads. Journal of Finance, 1998, 53(6): 2225-2241.

Longstaff F A, Mithal S, Neis E. Corporate yield spreads: Default risk or liquidity? New evidence from the credit default swap market. Journal of Finance, 2005, 60(5): 2213-2253.

Chen L, Liang B. A multi-factor model for the analysis of bond portfolio returns and risk. Journal of Fixed Income, 2007, 17(1): 47-66.

Collin-Dufresne P, Goldstein R S, Jones C S. Can interest rate volatility explain the cross section of corporate bond returns? Journal of Finance, 2008, 63(4): 2273-2302.

Bailey J V, Lopez de Silanes F. A multi-factor model for Canadian fixed-income mutual funds. Journal of Fixed Income, 2012, 22(4): 5-23.

Sharpe W F. Mutual fund performance. The Journal of business, 1966, 39(1): 119-138.

Downloads

Published

09-05-2023

How to Cite

Fan, J. (2023). Alpha Strategy for Stripping Beta Returns for Pure Bond Funds. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 10, 436-442. https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v10i.8136