Research on Technology Governance of ChatGPT from the Perspective of Tripartite Evolutionary Game

Authors

  • Ruirui Rao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v9i.9249

Keywords:

ChatGPT; Tripartite Evolutionary Game; Technology Governance.

Abstract

With science and technology such as ChatGPT integrating into society, the standardization of technology governance becomes the key to consolidating government power, promoting enterprise development, and enhancing people’s livelihood and well-being. Based on a tripartite game model of government, enterprises, and consumers, this paper analyzes their interaction mechanism and evolutionary stability strategy through the dynamic evolutionary game. The results show that there is a stable strategy up against the high risk, that is, enterprises will “use” ChatGPT, consumers will “participate in” ChatGPT, and the government will “advocate” ChatGPT. When the risk is low, two stable strategies exist, in which enterprises still “use” ChatGPT, while the government and consumers have different choices under different strategies. The research results can be used for reference to standardize ChatGPT and promote technical governance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cheng, H. D. & Chen, F. Understanding technological governance in the context of practice. China Social Science Review. (2021). No. 03, p. 83-90+159.

Li, T. & Feng, H. X. Digital governance: Its multi-dimensional perspective, scientific connotation, and basic elements. Journal of Nanjing University (Philosophy, Humanities, and Social Sciences). Vol. 59. (2022). No. 01, p. 70-79+157-158.

Zhang, X. H. ChatGPT-like artificial intelligence technology embedded in digital governance: value, risk, its prevention and control. E-government. (2023). No. 04, p. 45-56.

Zhao, J. W., Wang, X., Li, D. W., Liu, A. S. & Zhou, H. Y. ChatGPT: Challenges, development, and governance. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (Social Sciences Edition). Vol. 36. (2023). No. 02, p. 188-192.

Fan, B. Risk identification and governance strategies for ChatGPT. Academia Bimestris. (2023). No. 02, p. 58-63.

Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O. et al. A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. (2023). p. 1-15.

Gordijn, B. & Have, H. ChatGPT: evolution or revolution?. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. (2023). p. 1-2.

Shen, Y., Heacock, L., Elias, J., Hentel, K. D., Reig, B., Shih, G. & Moy, L. ChatGPT and other large language models are double-edged swords. Radiology. Vol. 307. (2023). No. 2, e230163.

Downloads

Published

13-06-2023

How to Cite

Rao, R. (2023). Research on Technology Governance of ChatGPT from the Perspective of Tripartite Evolutionary Game. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 9, 698-706. https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v9i.9249