Exploring the Obstacles to the Legalization of Same-Sex Marriage in Macau: The Interplay of Law, Culture, and Politics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/jeqafd37Keywords:
The Interplay of Law, Culture, and Politics, Same-Sex Marriage in Macau, Obstacles to the Legalization of Same-sex MarriageAbstract
With the development of the times and the continuous change of social concepts, the awareness of sexual minorities on their rights is increasing, and more and more countries and regions are promoting the legalization of same-sex marriages in response to the trend of social pluralism and the protection of marriage equality and other related issues. The adoption of legal provisions and institutions for same-sex marriage provides legal protection for sexual minorities in marriage and family. However, Macao, as a region with a highly developed economy, where East meets West and where inclusiveness is strong, is lagging behind developed countries and regions such as Europe and the United States in the legalization of same-sex marriages. Currently, there is no legal provision in the legal system of Macao that stipulates the validity of same-sex marriages, and there is no legal recognition of the legalization of same-sex marriages in any legal form. This institutional gap makes same-sex couples lack the protection of family rights at the legal level, and they do not enjoy the same rights as heterosexual couples in terms of property inheritance and adoption. In this paper, we will analyze the legal provisions, interpret the institutional structure, and observe Macau's local society and culture to explore the resistance factors to the legalization of same-sex marriages in Macau: firstly, at the level of the legal system, it is clearly stipulated that the subject of the marriage is of the opposite sex in Macau's Civil Code, and there is a lack of anti-discriminatory mechanism and design of a pluralistic marriage system; secondly, at the level of culture and religion, the traditional Confucianism is deeply entrenched, coupled with Catholicism, which has long influenced the culture and values of Macau's inhabitants. Secondly, at the cultural and religious levels, the deep-rooted traditional Confucianism and the Catholic culture have long influenced the culture and values of Macao residents, resulting in a lack of social acceptance of same-sex marriages; and finally, at the social level, the low level of political participation of Macao residents and the limited mobilization capacity of the civil society have further weakened the impetus of the society. This paper argues that the resistance to the failure to legalize same-sex marriage in Macao is not merely a matter of legal technicalities, but rather the result of a confluence of multiple factors. Through the analysis of legal texts and realities, it can be found that the current exclusion of sexual minorities in Macau is characterized by the dual features of institutional and cultural, thus the foundation for the subsequent legalization of same-sex marriage in Macau can be laid through the reform of the legal system, the guidance of cultural perceptions and the reconstruction of the political participation mechanism.
Downloads
References
[1] The Danish Registered Partnership Act, D/341-H-ML Act No. 372 of June 1, 1989.
[2] Excluded. (2018, August 3). Plataforma Media. https:// www. plataformamedia.com/zh-hant/2018/08/ 03/%E6% 8E % 92% E9%99%A4%E5%9C%A8%E5%A4%96/.
[3] Ireland legalizes same-sex marriage by national referendum. (2015, May). JUR-IST. http://jurist.org/paperchase/ 2015/ 05/ireland-legalizes-same-sex-marriage-by-national-referendum. php.
[4] Legislative Assembly rejects same-sex union law. (2013, March 29). “Macau Daily News”. http://www. macaodaily. com/html/2025-05/31/node_2.htm.
[5] Legislative Council receives more than 1,000 signatures against this legislation: Same-sex civil unions bill vetoed with only one vote in favor. (2013, March 29). “OCBC News”. http://www.vakiodaily.com/.
[6] Macau authorities say same-sex marriage not yet legal, inappropriate to include domestic violence law. (2013, March 3). “Sohu News”. https://news.sohu.com/20130303/.
[7] Rainbow Flash Mob at St. Paul's - 2013 International No More Homophobia D-ay. (2013, May 4). “Macau Rainbow”.
[8] Report on public opinion survey on the eve of the 10th anniversary of Macao's handover. (2009, December 16). “Macao Polytechnic University”. https://news.sina.com. cn/ c/2009-12-16/035316778266s.shtml.
[9] Taiwan court rules same-sex couples from Taiwan and Macau can marry. (2021, May 6). “TDM”. https://www.tdm. com. mo/ zh-hant/news-detail/563682.
[10] The modern value of traditional filial piety culture. (2016, July 4). “Guangmi-ng Daily”. http://www.xinhuanet.com/ politics/ 2016-07/04/c_129112238.htm.
[11] 2025 briefing on the survival status of transgender communities in China's Mainland, Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan. (2025, May 31). https://docs.transchinese.org/.
[12] Chen, J., Guo, P., & Xue, Q. (2020, July 15). Study on the formation mechani-sm of sex-related behaviors of Macao adolescents: Analysis of moderating effects based on sexual knowledge acquisition channels. “Youth Explorations”.
[13] Catholic education core values: Cultivating youth in clean virtue and resistance to temptation. (2024, October 18). “Catholic Newspaper”, “4209”.
[14] Gao, T. (2013, March 22). Stands up for gays, introduces same-sex union bill. “Waou”. https://www.waou. com.mo/ 2013/ 03/22.
[15] Grestman, E. (2004). “Same-sex marriage and the constitution”. Cambridge Uni-versity Press.
[16] Huang, C., Yu, H., Zhang, Y., & Yin, Y. (2022, May 25). Analysis of the dem-and for sexual support services of college students studying in Macao SAR. “Chinese Sexual Science”.
[17] Huang, M. (2015). A constitutional analysis of the same-sex marriage decision: Interpreting the majority opinion in “Obergefell”. “China Law Review”, “4”(4).
[18] Lawrence v. Texas, 593 U.S. 558 (2003). Justia. https:// supreme. justia.com/case-s/federal/us/539/558/.
[19] Li, E. (2013). On the protection of homosexuals' right to marriage. “Beijing N-ormal University Law”.
[20] Li, X. (2013, May 28). On the civil law status of same-sex marriage.
[21] Ma, P. “A constitutional study of homosexuality”. Law Press.
[22] Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015). Justia. https:// supreme. justia.com/c-ases/federal/us/576/644/.
[23] Qiao, X. On the relationship between the Constitution and the Basic Law. “Ch-inese and Foreign Law Review”.
[24] Teng, Y. Political participation of Macao residents and its improvement path.
[25] United States v. Windsor, 570 U.S. 744 (2013). Justia. https:// supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/570/744/.
[26] U.S. Consulate General in Hong Kong and Macau. (2023, May 15). “Macau international religious freedom report 2022”. Office of International Religious Freedom.
[27] Wang, C. (2021). The judicial review system of Macao courts as a guarantee o-f individual freedom and its implications for comparison with Hong Kong's judicial review system. “Macao Law Journal”, “2”.
[28] Wang, J. (2007). On the principle of freedom of marriage in marriage law. “E-ntrepreneurs' World”, “4”.
[29] Wang, L. “China's attitude toward same-sex marriage, transgender marriage, int-ernet marriage, and de facto marriage”.
[30] Wu, Z. An analysis of the constitutional model of the Basic Law of the Maca-o Special Administrative Region. “Politics and Law”.
[31] Xue, N. (2000). A comparative study of the marriage systems of Macao and the mainland. “China Law Yearbook”, “1”.
[32] Yu, Q. Exposing the true face of gender equality education in Taiwan. “Neighb-orhoods of the Kingdom of God”, “25”.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.