Analysis on the Commercial Competition Mode of Online Car Rental-Taking Didi and Uber as Examples
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/macnat29Keywords:
Ride-hailing, platform strategy, multi-homing, pricing design, regulation.Abstract
In recent years, ride-hailing has reshaped how people move through cities. With the help of mobile technology and algorithm-driven dispatch, platforms like Didi and Uber have grown into integral parts of urban mobility systems. However, their expansion also raises important questions about pricing, regulation, and long-term sustainability. This study takes a close look at Didi and Uber, examining how the structure of their operating markets and the rules they face influence their business choices and performance. Drawing from published research and selected operational indicators, this study compares their approaches across four areas: how they define their markets, the range of services they offer, how they generate revenue, and how they respond to regulatory demands. This study finds that Didi builds depth within a single domestic market, while Uber spreads risk across regions. These strategies lead to different outcomes when dealing with pricing pressure, driver behavior, and policy constraints. The study also shows how pricing tools like surge must be balanced with fairness, and how commission or incentive changes affect supply dynamics. Ultimately, the findings offer insights for both platform managers and regulators trying to navigate complex, fast-moving digital marketplaces.
Downloads
References
[1] Bakos Y, Halaburda H. Platform competition with multihoming on both sides: Subsidize or not? Management Science, 2020, 66 (12): 5599-5607.
[2] Yu J, Chen X, Qian X. Exploring multi-homing behavior of ride-sourcing drivers. Transportation Research Part A, 2021, 149: 356-372.
[3] Bai J, Heese H S, Tripathy M. Hiding in plain sight: Surge pricing and strategic providers. Production and Operations Management, 2023, 32 (12): 3837-3855.
[4] Xu M, Anupriya, Bansal P. Surge pricing and consumer surplus in the ride-hailing market: Evidence from China. Travel Behaviour and Society, 2023, 32: 100638.
[5] Guo X. Understanding multi-homing and switching by platform drivers. Transportation Research Part C, 2023, 154: 104210.
[6] Yang J, Zhao L, et al. Impact of regulation on on-demand ride-sharing service. Telecommunications Policy, 2022, 46 (8): 102377.
[7] Chan N K, Kwok C. Platform power in China vs the US: Ride-hailing cases. Global Media and China, 2022, 7 (3): 260-276.
[8] Creemers R. China’s emerging data-protection framework. Journal of Cybersecurity, 2022, 8 (1): tyac011.
[9] Luo Y, Zhang S, Liu X. Competitiveness of taxis vs ride-hailing: Beijing case. Transportation Research Part A, 2024, 185: 103666.
[10] Uber Technologies Inc. Uber announces results for Q4 and full-year 2024. Corporate Press Release, 2025.
[11] Li J, Huang H, Li L, Wu J. Bilateral pricing with cross-group effects and congestion. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 2023, 18 (4): 1721-1740.
[12] Hryhoryeva M, Leclercq L. Competition in ride-hailing operations: Distances & performance. Transportation Research Record, 2024, 2678 (1): 439-459.
[13] Agarwal S, Mani A, Pal R, Tiwari S. Ride-hailing and congestion. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2023, 25 (5): 1441-1460.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

