The Differentiated Influence of Digitalization of United Kingdom Manufacturing Industry on Operational Performance-A Comparative Study of Large Enterprises and Small and Medium-sized Enterprises as an Example

Authors

  • Ruihan Wu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/164bad50

Keywords:

Digital transformation, operations management, SMEs, OEE, made smarter.

Abstract

Amid labour shortages, high energy costs and supply chain volatility, UK manufacturing is leveraging digitalisation to enhance operational performance and resilience. At the enterprise level, digital intensity correlates positively with productivity, with large enterprises leading Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) in digital capital, data governance and system integration. The national ‘Made Smarter’ programme lowers barriers through diagnostics, funding and training, bolstering organisational capabilities. This paper compares multiple indicators to examine digital pathways and returns. Large enterprises prioritise master data governance and system interface cleansing, following a ‘governance-first, compounding gains’ trajectory. BAE Systems' ‘Future Factory’ and Rolls-Royce's digital twin initiatives demonstrate sustained improvements in lead times and Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE). SMEs follow a ‘bottleneck prioritisation – visualisation – small-scale automation’ approach, achieving localised improvements in First Pass Yield (FPY) and lead time reduction within 3-6 months. However, without comprehensive process and data governance, returns plateau during expansion phases. Predictive maintenance research underpins reduced downtime and stable delivery. This paper establishes linkages between metrics, mechanisms, and case studies, proposing reusable implementation sequences and key human-factor governance principles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Coyle D, Lind K, Nguyen D, Tong M. Digital Transformation and Firm Productivity: Evidence from the UK. ESCoE Discussion Paper, 2024, 2022.

[2] ESCoE. Are digital using UK firms more productive? Web Summary Report, 2024.

[3] UKRI. Evaluation of the Made Smarter Innovation Challenge – Final Report. UK Research and Innovation Report, 2025.

[4] UKRI. Evaluation of the Made Smarter Innovation Challenge – Annex. UK Research and Innovation Report, 2025.

[5] Made Smarter UK. Adoption Programme (eligibility, technologies & regions). Made Smarter Policy Document, 2025.

[6] GOV.UK. Made Smarter Adoption research project – summary findings. Government Research Brief, 2024.

[7] BAE Systems. Factory of the Future (official page & case stories). Corporate Innovation Report, 2025.

[8] Rolls Royce. Digital Twin – enabling improvements in testing, maintenance and lifespan. Technical White Paper, 2025.

[9] Masood T, Sonntag P. Industry 4.0: Adoption challenges and benefits for SMEs. Computers in Industry, 2020, 121: 103261.

[10] Tian M, Chen Y, Tian G, Huang W, Hu C. The role of digital transformation practices in the operations improvement in manufacturing firms: A practice based view. International Journal of Production Economics, 2023, 262: 108929.

[11] Jardine A K S, Lin D, Banjevic D. A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition based maintenance. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2006, 20 (7): 1483-1510.

[12] Teece D J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28 (13): 1319-1350.

[13] Tornatzky L G, Fleischer M. The Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington Books, 1990.

[14] Elhusseiny H M, et al. SMEs, barriers and opportunities on adopting Industry 4.0. Procedia Computer Science, 2022, 196: 246-253.

Downloads

Published

30-12-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Wu, R. (2025). The Differentiated Influence of Digitalization of United Kingdom Manufacturing Industry on Operational Performance-A Comparative Study of Large Enterprises and Small and Medium-sized Enterprises as an Example. Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 13(3), 306-311. https://doi.org/10.54097/164bad50