The Impact of ESG Rating Divergence on Corporate Performance: The Mediating Role of Innovation Capacity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/x4s13227Keywords:
ESG Rating Divergence; Corporate Performance; Innovation Capability; Mediating Effect; Heterogeneity Analysis.Abstract
Against the backdrop of the global transformation of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) policies and the advancement of China’s “dual carbon” goals, ESG rating divergence has become a key barrier restricting the sustainable development of enterprises. This study adopts empirical methods such as fixed effects model and mediating effect model to systematically explore the impact and mechanism of ESG rating divergence on corporate performance, and conducts heterogeneity analysis from three dimensions: geographical location, industrial technological characteristics, and pollution intensity. The results show that: ESG rating divergence significantly inhibits corporate performance, and this conclusion remains valid after robustness tests such as lagged term test and variable replacement; corporate innovation capability plays a partial mediating role between ESG rating divergence and corporate performance; heterogeneity analysis indicates that the inhibitory effect of ESG rating divergence on performance is more significant for enterprises in southern China, high-tech enterprises, and low-pollution enterprises. The conclusions of this study enrich the theoretical research on the economic consequences of ESG ratings, and provide practical implications for regulators to improve the ESG standard system, enterprises to optimize ESG practices and innovation resource allocation, and rating agencies to standardize rating processes.
Downloads
References
[1] Avramov, D., Cheng, S., Lioui, A., and Tarelli, A. (2022). Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty. J. Finan. Econ. 145, 642–664 doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.09.009
[2] Berg, F., Kölbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315–1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033
[3] Boulhaga, M., Bouri, A., Elamer, A. A., & Ibrahim, B. A. (2023). Environmental, social and governance ratings and firm performance: The moderating role of internal control quality. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(1), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2343
[4] Cheng, Q., Lou, Y., Yang, M. (2025). ESG reporting divergence. Unpublished manuscript.
[5] Christensen, D. M., Serafeim, G., & Sikochi, A. (2022). Why is corporate virtue in the eye of the beholder? The case of ESG ratings. The Accounting Review, 97(1), 147–175.
[6] Liu, M. (2022). Quantitative ESG disclosure and divergence of ESG ratings. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 936798. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.936798
[7] Lin, Y., R. Shen, J. Wang, and J. Yu. 2024. Global evolution of environmental and social disclosure in annual reports. Journal of Accounting Research 62 (5): 1941-1988.
[8] Gibson Brandon, R., Krueger, P., and Schmidt, P. S. (2021). ESG rating disagreement and stock returns. Financ. Anal. J. 77, 104–127. doi: 10.1080/0015198X.2021.1963186
[9] Servaes, H., and Tamayo, A. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Manager. Sci. 59, 1045–1061. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1630
[10] Wang, Y., & Wang, X. (2024). From ratings to action: The impact of ESG performance on corporate innovation. Heliyon, 10, e26683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26683
[11] Zhang, Y. (2025). Does ESG performance affect enterprise innovation performance? A study on governance and resource effects. SAGE Open, 14(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251357360
[12] Zheng, J., Khurram, M. U., & Chen, L. (2022). Can green innovation affect ESG ratings and financial performance? Evidence from Chinese GEM listed companies. Sustainability, 14(14), 8677. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148677
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

