Reconfiguring Community Services in a Mobility-Oriented City Evidence from Beijing

Authors

  • Zixuan Tian

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/1rwxbm26

Keywords:

Job-housing Separation, Urban Mobility, Community-Based Social Work, Trajectory-Based Social Networks, Transit-oriented Service Interfaces

Abstract

Job-housing separation and everyday mobility have become distinguishing characteristics of metropolitanization and permanent large-scale spatial restructuring of cities that is increasingly problematic to models of community service based on territory. This paper analyzes the effects of mobility-based social organization on the way the residents utilize community services and enhances structural discrepancy of the services. Through the particular example of Beijing, the study uses the trajectory-directed social network approach to study and examine the interrelationship among job-housing separation, commutative time, and the spatial structure of community-based social work. Based on secondary data, the paper shows that social relations among residents are becoming structured around rising comings and goings of everyday mobility instead of residential communities, which undermines informal supports and generates disparities in access to services especially to working-age commuters. The results also indicate that transit-oriented spaces serve as strategically relevant interfaces between extremely mobile populations, and skewed service dispensal systems. This reimagination of the process of community service delivery based on a mobility-based perspective offers the field of social work and city services a conceptual tool to evolve into a highly mobile context based on this community service framework.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Wang, S., Yun, Y., & Sun, Z. (2016, June). Intelligent Development Research on Job-Housing Space in Chinese Metropolitan Area under the Background of Rapid Urbanization. In REAL CORP 2016–SMART ME UP! How to become and how to stay a Smart City, and does this improve quality of life? Proceedings of 21st International Conference on Urban Planning, Regional Development and Information Society (pp. 391-400). CORP–Competence Center of Urban and Regional Planning.

[2] Wang, E., Song, J., & Xu, T. (2011). From “spatial bond” to “spatial mismatch”: An assessment of changing jobs–housing relationship in Beijing. Habitat International, 35(2), 398-409.

[3] Hu, L., Sun, T., & Wang, L. (2018). Evolving urban spatial structure and commuting patterns: A case study of Beijing, China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 59, 11-22.

[4] Cervero, R., Guerra, E., & Al, S. (2017). Beyond mobility: Planning cities for people and places. Island Press.

[5] Beijing Transportation Development Institute. (2022, April 22). 2021 Beijing commuting characteristics annual report [Data report]. Beijing Municipal Government. Retrieved from https: // www.beijing.gov.cn/fuwu/bmfw/sy/jrts/202204/t20220422_2685483.html.

[6] Wiedmann, F., & Wang, Y. (2020). Investigating integrated urbanism in Chinese edge cities: the case of Yizhuang Development Area. Open House International, 45(1/2), 23-38.

[7] Sadana, R. (2021). The moving city: Scenes from the Delhi metro and the social life of infrastructure. Univ of California Press.

[8] Stojanovski, T. (2020). Urban design and public transportation–public spaces, visual proximity and Transit-Oriented Development (TOD). Journal of Urban Design, 25(1), 134-154.

Downloads

Published

19-03-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Tian, Z. (2026). Reconfiguring Community Services in a Mobility-Oriented City Evidence from Beijing. Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 15(1), 209-214. https://doi.org/10.54097/1rwxbm26