Investigating the Impact Mechanism of Corporate Digital Transformation on Carbon Emission Intensity under the Dual Carbon Goals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/1dg3cq94Keywords:
Corporate Digital Transformation, Carbon Emission Intensity, R&D Investment, Dual Carbon GoalsAbstract
Under the impetus of the dual carbon strategy and the burgeoning digital economy, Chinese enterprises have been rapidly embracing digital transformation, with the adoption rate of digital technologies reaching 47.4% by 2023. Nevertheless, the nuanced interplay between corporate digitalization and carbon emission intensity remains insufficiently understood. Employing panel data from China's A-share listed firms spanning 2010 to 2022, this study systematically investigates how corporate digital transformation shapes carbon emission intensity. Empirical results demonstrate that digital transformation substantially curtails corporate carbon emission intensity, a finding that withstands a battery of robustness checks including the Heckman two-stage correction and propensity score matching. Mechanism analysis further reveals that digital transformation attenuates carbon emission intensity primarily through augmenting R&D expenditure. Heterogeneity tests indicate that this mitigating effect is particularly salient among state-owned enterprises and firms audited by Big Four accounting firms. These findings not only advance scholarly understanding of the determinants of corporate carbon emission intensity but also offer practical implications for leveraging digitalization to foster low-carbon development and the realization of China's dual carbon objectives.
Downloads
References
[1] Jiang, C., Yan, Z., & Wang, M. (2024). From dual control of energy consumption to dual control of carbon emissions under the constraint of dual carbon goals: Regulatory tools, effect simulation and policy evaluation. China Industrial Economics, (11), 5-23.
[2] Yang, P., Jia, J., Guo, K., et al. (2024). Corporate digital transformation and carbon emission reduction: Direct impact, mechanism and driving effect. Statistics & Decision, 40(10), 173-178.
[3] Zhuo, R., & Chen, J. (2023). Digital transformation and corporate innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 156, 113-125.
[4] Su, X., Wang, L., & Zhang, Y. (2023). The impact of digital transformation on production performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 191, 122-134.
[5] Wang, H., & Yao, G. (2025). Research on the impact of digital transformation on corporate performance: The mediating effect of entrepreneurship. Enterprise Economy, (3), 150-160.
[6] Duan, H., Yang, X., & Dong, F. (2023). Digital transformation, financing constraints and corporate innovation. Statistics & Decision, 39(5), 164-168.
[7] Zhao, C., Wang, W., & Li, X. (2021). How digital transformation affects corporate total factor productivity. Finance & Trade Economics, 42(7), 114-129.
[8] Ma, H., & Chen, S. (2022). Corporate digital transformation, bad news hiding and stock price crash risk. Accounting Research, (10), 31-44.
[9] Wang, D., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Corporate digital transformation, strategic green innovation and corporate environmental performance. Economic Research Journal, 59(10), 113-131.
[10] Dai, X., & Ma, H. (2023). Can digital transformation definitely increase the markup rate of enterprises? Journal of Financial Research, (5), 134-151.
[11] Liu, S., Yan, J., Zhang, S., et al. (2021). Can the digital transformation of enterprise management improve input-output efficiency? Management World, 37(5), 170-190.
[12] Zhang, P., Xiao, Y., Liu, H., et al. (2024). Research on the asymmetric impact of digital transformation on output fluctuations of upstream and downstream supply chains. The Journal of World Economy, 47(7), 123-152.
[13] Yang, P., Jia, J., Guo, K., et al. (2024). Corporate digital transformation and carbon emission reduction: Direct impact, mechanism and driving effect. Statistics & Decision, 40(10), 173-178.
[14] Shu, W., & Chen, Y. (2024). Research on digital transformation and corporate commercial credit financing behavior. Accounting Research, (1), 79-93.
[15] Tu, X., & Zhang, P. (2024). Corporate digital transformation, carbon emissions and supply chain spillovers. China Industrial Economics, (4), 133-151.
[16] Jiang, C., Yan, Z., & Wang, M. (2024). From dual control of energy consumption to dual control of carbon emissions under the constraint of dual carbon goals. China Industrial Economics, (11), 5-23.
[17] Chapple, L., Clarkson, P. M., & Gold, D. L. (2005). The cost of carbon: Capital market effects of the proposed emission trading scheme (ETS). Abacus, 49(1), 1-33.
[18] Wu, F., Hu, H., & Lin, H. (2021). Corporate digital transformation in the era of digital economy: Strategic change and management reconstruction. Management World, 37(5), 1-20.
[19] Cai, H., Tang, C., & Han, J. (2023). Tax reduction incentives, supply chain spillovers and digital transformation. Economic Research Journal, 58(7), 156-173.
[20] Pan, H., & Han, F. (2016). Propensity score matching methods in empirical accounting research. Accounting Research, (6), 42-49.
[21] Li, J., et al. (2018). Heckman two-step correction for sample selection bias in corporate finance research. Journal of Financial Economics, 128(2), 345-367.
[22] DeFond, M. L., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2-3), 275-326.
[23] Francis, J. R., Philbrick, D. R., & Schipper, K. (2018). Have financial statements become less decision-useful? The Accounting Review, 93(1), 111-137.
[24] Becker, C. L., DeFond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J., & Subramanyam, K. R. (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), 1-24.
[25] Francis, J. R., & Krishnan, J. (1999). The effect of audit firm size and accrual-based earnings management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 18(1), 1-17.
[26] Knechel, W. R., Vanstraelen, A., & Zerni, F. (2013). Auditor reputation, industry specialization, and earnings management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(1), 1-21.
[27] Francis, J. R., & Yu, X. (2009). Cost of equity and earnings attributes. The Accounting Review, 84(2), 411-439.
[28] Lim, J. Y., & Tan, H. T. (2015). Auditor-specific industry expertise and the cost of equity capital. The British Accounting Review, 47(1), 23-38.
[29] Chen, C. J., Chen, S. H., & Su, X. (2019). Profitability regulation, earnings management, and modified audit opinions: Evidence from China. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 38(1), 1-21.
[30] Firth, M., Fung, P. M., & Rui, O. M. (2006). Auditor switching, earnings management, and auditor tenure: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(1-2), 39-75.
[31] Lin, Y., & Li, Z. (2004). Policy burdens, moral hazard and soft budget constraints. Economic Research Journal, (2), 17-27.
[32] Brandt, L., & Li, H. (2003). Bank discrimination in transition economies: Ideology, information, or incentives? Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(3), 387-413.
[33] Fu, J., Si, X., & Cao, X. (2018). The impact of emission trading mechanism on green development. China Population, Resources and Environment, 28(8), 12-21.
[34] Zhou, L., & Luo, K. (2005). Firm size and innovation: Empirical evidence from the provincial level in China. China Economic Quarterly, (2), 623-638.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

