The Impact of Smart Ecological Monitoring on Corporate ESG Greenwashing Behavior

-- Quasi-Natural Empirical Evidence Based on Ecological Monitoring Data

Authors

  • Ruyu He
  • Huan Huang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/srr2r909

Keywords:

Smart Ecological Monitoring, ESG Greenwashing, Digital Regulation, Agency Cost, Information Disclosure Transparency, Financing Constraints

Abstract

As for the global green shift and corporations are doing their very own version, which is ESG greenwash, and that's becoming a bit like a distortion when companies disclose all other info rather than the financial stuff. Using enterprise samples used as data sources in this article from 2014-2025, we examine how the use of smart ecosystemic surveillance can help stop firms from engaging in ESG greenwashing and the causes behind it. It is discovered to the research, the smart ecological monitoring was implemented, which greatly reduced corporate ESG greenwashing behaviour. This conclusion also went through robustness checks such as parallel trends check and placebos, and alternate variants. Mechanism mainly goes through 3 channels, improve the transparency of corporates’ info disclosure, reduce agency costs, and ease the fin constraint. And then heterogeneity analysis, we see that there is a big inhibitory effect coming from smart ecological monitering against ESG greenwashing. In that specific context, we could see that this happened much stronger with sov. Enterprise, the company located in a west part area, and non high tech type of business. It can show whether smart ecology supervision has a different effect in controlling corporate ESG information disclosing behavior based on the different background. The paper also brings more research materials for digital watching over in corporate e-society information disclosures; offers very helpful experience and real ways about improving e-soils and blueprints that use tech and push up the progress of cash venues.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Liu X, Wang C, Wang X. Greenwashing and corporate market power [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2025, 486(144486.

[2] Zhang D, Rong Z, Ji Q. Green innovation and firm performance: Evidence from listed companies in China [J]. Resources, conservation and recycling, 2019, 144(48-55.

[3] Huang X, Tang C, Liu Y, et al. Greening or greenwashing? Corporate green bonds and stock pricing efficiency in China [J]. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 2025, 16(3): 874-913.

[4] Xu Y, Li S, Zhou X, et al. How environmental regulations affect the development of green finance: Recent evidence from polluting firms in China [J]. Renewable Energy, 2022, 189(917-26.

[5] He G, Jiang H, Zhu Y. The effect of digital technology development on the improvement of environmental governance capacity: A case study of China [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2024, 165(112162.

[6] Wan J, Ma W, Mao C. Navigating economic and legal compliance in digital resource management: Technological Pathways to sustainability with digital government [J]. Resources Policy, 2024, 95(105110.

[7] Li C, Chen X, Yuan C. Does digital government reduce carbon emissions? Empirical evidence from global sources [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2025, 380(125081.

[8] Cao G, She J, Cao C, et al. Environmental Protection Tax and Green Innovation: The Mediating Role of Digitalization and ESG [J]. Sustainability, 2024, 16(2):

[9] Lucia G, Marta P, Peter S. Green lies and their effect on intention to invest [J]. Journal of Business Research, 2021, 127(228-40.

[10] Li X, Li J, Shen Q. Infection mechanism of greenwashing behavior of construction material enterprises under multi-agent interaction [J]. Developments in the Built Environment, 2024, 17(100321.

[11] Battisti E, Bo S, Petruzzella F, et al. Greenwashing and Sustainability Disclosure in the Climate Change Context: The Influence of Third‐Party Certification on Chinese Companies [J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2025,

[12] Delmas M A, Burbano V C. The drivers of greenwashing [J]. California management review, 2011, 54(1): 64-87.

[13] He L, Zhang L, Zhong Z, et al. Green credit, renewable energy investment and green economy development: Empirical analysis based on 150 listed companies of China [J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2019, 208(363-72.

[14] Spence A M. Market signaling: Informational transfer in hiring and related screening processes [J]. (No Title), 1974,

[15] Chung R K, Margolin A M, Vyakina I V. Theory and practice of ESG transformation of management systems [J]. Экономическая политика, 2023, 18(2): 80-103.

[16] Oyewole A T, Adeoye O B, Addy W A, et al. Promoting sustainability in finance with AI: A review of current practices and future potential [J]. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2024, 21(3): 590-607.

[17] Dmuchowski P, Dmuchowski W, Baczewska-Dąbrowska A H, et al. Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) model; impacts and sustainable investment–Global trends and Poland's perspective [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2023, 329(117023.

[18] Seele P, Schultz M D. From greenwashing to machinewashing: A model and future directions derived from reasoning by analogy [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2022, 178(4): 1063-89.

[19] Ruiz-Blanco S, Romero S, Fernandez-Feijoo B. Green, blue or black, but washing–What company characteristics determine greenwashing? [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2022, 24(3): 4024-45.

[20] Liang H, Sun L, Teo M. Greenwashing: Evidence from hedge funds [J]. 2021,

[21] Abadie A, Chowdhury S, Mangla S K, et al. Impact of carbon offset perceptions on greenwashing: Revealing intentions and strategies through an experimental approach [J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2024, 117(304-20.

[22] Zervoudi E K, Moschos N, Christopoulos A G. From the corporate social responsibility (CSR) and the environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria to the greenwashing phenomenon: A comprehensive literature review about the causes, consequences and solutions of the phenomenon with specific case studies [J]. Sustainability, 2025, 17(5): 2222.

[23] Panagopoulos A. The use of sustainable financial instruments in relation to the social impact investment. ESG policies, capital markets’ approach and investors’ protection. an innovative perspective [J]. ESG Policies, Capital Markets’ Approach and Investors’ Protection An Innovative Perspective (May 25, 2022), 2022,

[24] Huang R, Xie X, Zhou H. ‘Isomorphic’behavior of corporate greenwashing [J]. Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, 2022, 20(1): 29-39.

[25] Wu T. Green finance reform policy increases corporate hypocritical business strategies: Evidence from the greenwashing behavior [J]. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2024, 29(7): 63.

[26] Flammer C. Corporate green bonds [J]. Journal of financial economics, 2021, 142(2): 499-516.

[27] Loughran T, McDonald B, Yun H. A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: The Use of Ethics-Related Terms in 10-K Reports [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2009, 89(S1): 39-49.

[28] Hoberg G, Lewis C. Do fraudulent firms produce abnormal disclosure? [J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2017, 43(58-85.

[29] Xinwen H, Renhai H, Qingfu L, et al. The green fog: Environmental rating disagreement and corporate greenwashing [J]. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2023, 78(

[30] Wang S, Li H, Zhang Y. The impact of big data tax administration on local fiscal revenue: New evidence from the "Golden Tax Project Phase III" [J]. Economic Analysis and Policy, 2025, 86(1409-26.

[31] Ascioglu A, Hegde S P, McDermott J B. Auditor compensation, disclosure quality, and market liquidity: Evidence from the stock market [J]. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 2005, 24(4): 325-54.

[32] Kim O, Verrecchia R E. The relation among disclosure, returns, and trading volume information [J]. The Accounting Review, 2001, 76(4): 633-54.

[33] Li C, Wang Y, Zhou Z, et al. Digital finance and enterprise financing constraints: Structural characteristics and mechanism identification [J]. Journal of Business Research, 2023, 165(114074.

[34] Zhang D. Green financial system regulation shock and greenwashing behaviors: Evidence from Chinese firms [J]. Energy Economics, 2022, 111(106064.

[35] Woo W T. China's soft budget constraint on the demand-side undermines its supply-side structural reforms [J]. China Economic Review, 2019, 57(101111.

[36] Deng, J., Yao, D., Deng, Y., Liu, Z., Yang, J., & Gong, D. (2024). Study on the impact of smart city construction on the health of the elderly population--A quasi-natural experiment in China. Plos one, 19(6), e0305897.

[37] Deng, Juqiu, et al. "Research on the Policy Effect and Mechanism of Central Environmental Protection Supervision System on Industrial Structure Upgrading–Empirical Evidence from 283 Prefecture-Level Cities in China." Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 32.6 (2023).

Downloads

Published

29-04-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

He, R., & Huang, H. (2026). The Impact of Smart Ecological Monitoring on Corporate ESG Greenwashing Behavior: -- Quasi-Natural Empirical Evidence Based on Ecological Monitoring Data. Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 15(2), 72-83. https://doi.org/10.54097/srr2r909